mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A new lower bound for multi-color discrepancy with applications to fair division

arXiv 2502.10516 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2025cs.GTcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A classical problem in combinatorics seeks colorings of low discrepancy. More concretely, the goal is to color the elements of a set system so that the number of appearances of any color among the elements in each set is as balanced as possible. We present a new lower bound for multi-color discrepancy, showing that there is a set system with n subsets over a set of elements in which any k-coloring of the elements has discrepancy at least Omegaleft(√fracnlnkright). This result improves the previously best-known lower bound of Omegaleft(√fracnkright) of Doerr and Srivastav [2003] and may have several applications. Here, we explore its implications on the feasibility of fair division concepts for instances with n agents having valuations for a set of indivisible items. The first such concept is known as consensus 1/k-division up to d items (cdd) and aims to allocate the items into k bundles so that no matter which bundle each agent is assigned to, the allocation is envy-free up to d items. The above lower bound implies that cdd can be infeasible for d∈ Omegaleft(√fracnlnkright). We furthermore extend our proof technique to show that there exist instances of the problem of allocating indivisible items to k groups of n agents in total so that envy-freeness and proportionality up to d items are infeasible for d∈ Omegaleft(√fracnklnkright) and d∈ Omegaleft(√fracnk3lnkright), respectively. The lower bounds for fair division improve the currently best-known ones by Manurangsi and Suksompong [2022].

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.