mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MathConstruct: Challenging LLM Reasoning with Constructive Proofs

arXiv 2502.10197 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2025cs.AIcited by 16

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance in mathematics, existing math benchmarks come with significant limitations. Many focus on problems with fixed ground-truth answers, and are often saturated due to problem simplicity or the viability of guessing or memorization. Crucially, they capture only a narrow subset of relevant math problems. To address this research gap, we introduce MathConstruct, a new benchmark of 121 challenging problems sourced from various math competitions, which targets constructive proofs, a widely encountered problem type requiring the construction of mathematical objects with specific properties. These proofs are particularly suitable for LLM evaluation, as solution correctness can be easily verified. Our automated verifiers also enable MathConstruct to generate problem variations, used to evaluate robustness. State-of-the-art LLMs solve only 60% of MathConstruct problems, highlighting its complexity and importance for LLM evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2025.

Builds on

4 of 32 references.

References · 4

  1. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  2. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  3. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  4. 2024ConStat: Performance-Based Contamination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 10; 2026: 6.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025BrokenMath: A Benchmark for Sycophancy in Theorem Proving with LLMs
  2. 2025Evaluating the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Underrepresented Mathematics Competition Problems
  3. 2024Not All Votes Count! Programs as Verifiers Improve Self-Consistency of Language Models for Math Reasoning
  4. 2025Thinking Machines: Mathematical Reasoning in the Age of LLMs
  5. 2025Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models
  6. 2026Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs
  7. 2025Reliable Fine-Grained Evaluation of Natural Language Math Proofs
  8. 2026Not All Proofs Are Equal: Evaluating LLM Proof Quality Beyond Correctness