A Deep Inverse-Mapping Model for a Flapping Robotic Wing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In systems control, the dynamics of a system are governed by modulating its inputs to achieve a desired outcome. For example, to control the thrust of a quad-copter propeller the controller modulates its rotation rate, relying on a straightforward mapping between the input rotation rate and the resulting thrust. This mapping can be inverted to determine the rotation rate needed to generate a desired thrust. However, in complex systems, such as flapping-wing robots where intricate fluid motions are involved, mapping inputs (wing kinematics) to outcomes (aerodynamic forces) is nontrivial and inverting this mapping for real-time control is computationally impractical. Here, we report a machine-learning solution for the inverse mapping of a flapping-wing system based on data from an experimental system we have developed. Our model learns the input wing motion required to generate a desired aerodynamic force outcome. We used a sequence-to-sequence model tailored for time-series data and augmented it with a novel adaptive-spectrum layer that implements representation learning in the frequency domain. To train our model, we developed a flapping wing system that simultaneously measures the wing's aerodynamic force and its 3D motion using high-speed cameras. We demonstrate the performance of our system on an additional open-source dataset of a flapping wing in a different flow regime. Results show superior performance compared with more complex state-of-the-art transformer-based models, with 11% improvement on the test datasets median loss. Moreover, our model shows superior inference time, making it practical for onboard robotic control. Our open-source data and framework may improve modeling and real-time control of systems governed by complex dynamics, from biomimetic robots to biomedical devices.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2025.
Builds on
10 of 57 references.
References · 10
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,654
- 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,400
- 2022FEDformer: Frequency Enhanced Decomposed Transformer for Long-term Series Forecastingcited by 1,200
- 2020Time Series Forecasting With Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 457
- 2021Spectral Temporal Graph Neural Network for Multivariate Time-series Forecastingcited by 298
- 2022Neural-Fly Enables Rapid Learning for Agile Flight in Strong Windscited by 80
- 2019Sampled Softmax with Random Fourier Featurescited by 33
- 2021State-space aerodynamic model reveals high force control authority and predictability in flapping flightcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.