The Paradox of Stochasticity: Limited Creativity and Computational Decoupling in Temperature-Varied LLM Outputs of Structured Fictional Data
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
This study examines how temperature settings and model architectures affect the generation of structured fictional data (names, birthdates) across three large language models (LLMs): llama3.1:8b, deepseek-r1:8b, and mistral:latest. By systematically testing temperature values from 0.0 to 1.0 in increments of 0.1, we conducted 330 trials yielding 889 structured entities, validated for syntactic consistency. Key findings reveal that model architecture significantly influences computational efficiency, with mistral:latest and llama3.1:8b processing data 8x faster than deepseek-r1:8b. Contrary to expectations, temperature showed no correlation with processing time, challenging assumptions about stochastic sampling costs. Output diversity remained limited, as models consistently defaulted to common name archetypes (e.g., 'John Doe' and 'Jane Smith') across all temperatures, though rare names clustered at intermediate values (0.3-0.7). These results demonstrate that architectural optimizations, rather than temperature adjustments, dominate performance in structured generation tasks. The findings emphasize prioritizing model selection over hyperparameter tuning for efficiency and suggest explicit diversity constraints are necessary to mitigate default output biases in synthetic data pipelines.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025QUDsim: Quantifying Discourse Similarities in LLM-Generated Textcited by 13
- 2026Quantifying Trust: Financial Risk Management for Trustworthy AI Agentscited by 8
- 2025Do Bias Benchmarks Generalise? Evidence from Voice-based Evaluation of Gender Bias in SpeechLLMscited by 7
- 2025SESGO: Spanish Evaluation of Stereotypical Generative Outputscited by 1
- 2026The Ultimate Tutorial for AI-driven Scale Development in Generative Psychometrics: Releasing AIGENIE from its Bottlecited by 1
- 2025Optimizing Humor Generation in Large Language Models: Temperature Configurations and Architectural Trade-offscited by 0
- 2026Quantifying Trust: Financial Risk Management for Trustworthy AI Agents5 Apr 2026
- 2026The Ultimate Tutorial for AI-driven Scale Development in Generative Psychometrics: Releasing AIGENIE from its Bottle30 Mar 2026
- 2025Do Bias Benchmarks Generalise? Evidence from Voice-based Evaluation of Gender Bias in SpeechLLMs24 Sep 2025
- 2025SESGO: Spanish Evaluation of Stereotypical Generative Outputs3 Sep 2025
- 2025QUDsim: Quantifying Discourse Similarities in LLM-Generated Text12 Apr 2025
- 2025Optimizing Humor Generation in Large Language Models: Temperature Configurations and Architectural Trade-offs31 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Thinking Like a Scientist? A Structural Study of LLM-Generated Research Methods
- 2025Optimizing Temperature for Language Models with Multi-Sample Inference
- 2026A Guide to Large Language Models in Modeling and Simulation: From Core Techniques to Critical Challenges
- 2026Same Input, Different Scores: A Multi Model Study on the Inconsistency of LLM Judge
- 2024Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Models
- 2025A Survey of Scientific Large Language Models: From Data Foundations to Agent Frontiers
- 2025Information Capacity: Evaluating the Efficiency of Large Language Models via Text Compression
- 2024Under the Surface: Tracking the Artifactuality of LLM-Generated Data