mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Clicks to Conversations: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conversational Agents in Statistical Analysis

arXiv 2502.08114 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2025cs.HC stat.COcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid proliferation of data science forced different groups of individuals with different backgrounds to adapt to statistical analysis. We hypothesize that conversational agents are better suited for statistical analysis than traditional graphical user interfaces (GUI). In this work, we propose a novel conversational agent, StatZ, for statistical analysis. We evaluate the efficacy of StatZ relative to established statistical software:SPSS, SAS, Stata, and JMP in terms of accuracy, task completion time, user experience, and user satisfaction. We combined the proposed analysis question from state-of-the-art language models with suggestions from statistical analysis experts and tested with 51 participants from diverse backgrounds. Our experimental design assessed each participant's ability to perform statistical analysis tasks using traditional statistical analysis tools with GUI and our conversational agent. Results indicate that the proposed conversational agents significantly outperform GUI statistical software in all assessed metrics, including quantitative (task completion time, accuracy, and user experience), and qualitative (user satisfaction) metrics. Our findings underscore the potential of using conversational agents to enhance statistical analysis processes, reducing cognitive load and learning curves and thereby proliferating data analysis capabilities, to individuals with limited knowledge of statistics.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2025.

Builds on

8 of 59 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024WaitGPT: Monitoring and Steering Conversational LLM Agent in Data Analysis with On-the-Fly Code Visualization3 Aug

Other references · 7

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020Conceptual Metaphors Impact Perceptions of Human-AI Collaborationcited by 47
  3. 2024Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted Approach for Qualitative Data Analysiscited by 20
  4. 2023ChatGPT vs. Google: A Comparative Study of Search Performance and User Experiencecited by 12
  5. 2022ODSearch: Fast and Resource Efficient On-device Natural Language Search for Fitness Trackers' Datacited by 5
  6. 2024A critical analysis of cognitive load measurement methods for evaluating the usability of different types of interfaces: guidelines and framework for Human-Computer Interactioncited by 2
  7. 2024Can LLMs substitute SQL? Comparing Resource Utilization of Querying LLMs versus Traditional Relational Databasescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026StatABench: Dataset and Framework for Evaluating Statistical Analysis Capabilities of LLMs
  2. 2025ConDABench: Interactive Evaluation of Language Models for Data Analysis
  3. 2025Can AI agents understand spoken conversations about data visualizations in online meetings?
  4. 2026CausalAgent: A Conversational Multi-Agent System for End-to-End Causal Inference
  5. 2024A Survey on Large Language Model-based Agents for Statistics and Data Science
  6. 2023Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems
  7. 2025Human vs. Agent in Task-Oriented Conversations
  8. 2025A Multimodal Conversational Agent for Tabular Data Analysis