mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Initialization Matters: Unraveling the Impact of Pre-Training on Federated Learning

arXiv 2502.08024 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.DCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Initializing with pre-trained models when learning on downstream tasks is becoming standard practice in machine learning. Several recent works explore the benefits of pre-trained initialization in a federated learning (FL) setting, where the downstream training is performed at the edge clients with heterogeneous data distribution. These works show that starting from a pre-trained model can substantially reduce the adverse impact of data heterogeneity on the test performance of a model trained in a federated setting, with no changes to the standard FedAvg training algorithm. In this work, we provide a deeper theoretical understanding of this phenomenon. To do so, we study the class of two-layer convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and provide bounds on the training error convergence and test error of such a network trained with FedAvg. We introduce the notion of aligned and misaligned filters at initialization and show that the data heterogeneity only affects learning on misaligned filters. Starting with a pre-trained model typically results in fewer misaligned filters at initialization, thus producing a lower test error even when the model is trained in a federated setting with data heterogeneity. Experiments in synthetic settings and practical FL training on CNNs verify our theoretical findings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.