mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Local Regularizers Are Not Transductive Learners

arXiv 2502.07187 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We partly resolve an open question raised by Asilis et al. (COLT 2024): whether the algorithmic template of local regularization -- an intriguing generalization of explicit regularization, a.k.a. structural risk minimization -- suffices to learn all learnable multiclass problems. Specifically, we provide a negative answer to this question in the transductive model of learning. We exhibit a multiclass classification problem which is learnable in both the transductive and PAC models, yet cannot be learned transductively by any local regularizer. The corresponding hypothesis class, and our proof, are based on principles from cryptographic secret sharing. We outline challenges in extending our negative result to the PAC model, leaving open the tantalizing possibility of a PAC/transductive separation with respect to local regularization.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.