On the query complexity of sampling from non-log-concave distributions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of sampling from a d-dimensional distribution with density p(x)propto e-f(x), which does not necessarily satisfy good isoperimetric conditions. Specifically, we show that for any L,M satisfying LM≥ d≥ 5, ε∈ left(0,frac132right), and any algorithm with query accesses to the value of f(x) and nabla f(x), there exists an L-log-smooth distribution with second moment at most M such that the algorithm requires left(fracLMdεright)Omega(d) queries to compute a sample whose distribution is within ε in total variation distance to the target distribution. We complement the lower bound with an algorithm requiring left(fracLMdεright)O(d) queries, thereby characterizing the tight (up to the constant in the exponent) query complexity for sampling from the family of non-log-concave distributions. Our results are in sharp contrast with the recent work of Huang et al. (COLT'24), where an algorithm with quasi-polynomial query complexity was proposed for sampling from a non-log-concave distribution when M=mathttpoly(d). Their algorithm works under the stronger condition that all distributions along the trajectory of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, starting from the target distribution, are O(1)-log-smooth. We investigate this condition and prove that it is strictly stronger than requiring the target distribution to be mathcal O(1)-log-smooth. Additionally, we study this condition in the context of mixtures of Gaussians. Finally, we place our results within the broader theme of ``sampling versus optimization'', as studied in Ma et al. (PNAS'19). We show that for a wide range of parameters, sampling is strictly easier than optimization by a super-exponential factor in the dimension d.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.
Builds on
25 of 33 references.
References · 25
- 2022Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptionscited by 440
- 2023Nearly d-Linear Convergence Bounds for Diffusion Models via Stochastic Localizationcited by 230
- 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 224
- 2022Improved Analysis of Score-based Generative Modeling: User-Friendly Bounds under Minimal Smoothness Assumptionscited by 215
- 2022Convergence of score-based generative modeling for general data distributionscited by 179
- 2023The probability flow ODE is provably fastcited by 145
- 2017Underdamped Langevin MCMC: A non-asymptotic analysiscited by 131
- 2018Log-concave sampling: Metropolis-Hastings algorithms are fastcited by 117
- 2017Convergence of Langevin MCMC in KL-divergencecited by 86
- 2019The Randomized Midpoint Method for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 77
- 2018Sampling Can Be Faster Than Optimizationcited by 68
- 2022Towards a Theory of Non-Log-Concave Sampling: First-Order Stationarity Guarantees for Langevin Monte Carlocited by 63
13 more
- 2020Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 57
- 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm startscited by 44
- 2017Beyond Log-concavity: Provable Guarantees for Sampling Multi-modal Distributions using Simulated Tempering Langevin Monte Carlocited by 33
- 2019Proximal Langevin Algorithm: Rapid Convergence Under Isoperimetrycited by 31
- 2023Towards a Complete Analysis of Langevin Monte Carlo: Beyond Poincar'e Inequalitycited by 31
- 2024Provable Benefit of Annealed Langevin Monte Carlo for Non-log-concave Samplingcited by 23
- 2024Zeroth-Order Sampling Methods for Non-Log-Concave Distributions: Alleviating Metastability by Denoising Diffusioncited by 19
- 2024Faster Sampling without Isoperimetry via Diffusion-based Monte Carlocited by 15
- 2023Convergence Rates for Non-Log-Concave Sampling and Log-Partition Estimationcited by 10
- 2022Sampling Approximately Low-Rank Ising Models: MCMC meets Variational Methodscited by 9
- 2024A Separation in Heavy-Tailed Sampling: Gaussian vs. Stable Oracles for Proximal Samplerscited by 5
- 2024Weak Poincar'e Inequalities, Simulated Annealing, and Sampling from Spherical Spin Glassescited by 3
- 2024On Sampling from Ising Models with Spectral Constraintscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025MDNS: Masked Diffusion Neural Sampler via Stochastic Optimal Controlcited by 20
- 2025Proximal Diffusion Neural Samplercited by 16
- 2025Score-based deterministic density samplingcited by 4
- 2026Query Lower Bounds for Diffusion Samplingcited by 2
- 2026Provable Quantum-Classical Separation for Continuous Gibbs Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Provable Quantum-Classical Separation for Continuous Gibbs Sampling25 Aug 2026
- 2026Query Lower Bounds for Diffusion Sampling12 Apr 2026
- 2025Proximal Diffusion Neural Sampler4 Oct 2025
- 2025MDNS: Masked Diffusion Neural Sampler via Stochastic Optimal Control14 Aug 2025
- 2025Score-based deterministic density sampling25 Apr 2025