mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detection of Physiological Data Tampering Attacks with Quantum Machine Learning

arXiv 2502.05966 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2025quant-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of cloud-based medical devices and wearable sensors has made physiological data susceptible to tampering. These attacks can compromise the reliability of healthcare systems which can be critical and life-threatening. Detection of such data tampering is of immediate need. Machine learning has been used to detect anomalies in datasets but the performance of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is still yet to be evaluated for physiological sensor data. Thus, our study compares the effectiveness of QML for detecting physiological data tampering, focusing on two types of white-box attacks: data poisoning and adversarial perturbation. The results show that QML models are better at identifying label-flipping attacks, achieving accuracy rates of 75%-95% depending on the data and attack severity. This superior performance is due to the ability of quantum algorithms to handle complex and high-dimensional data. However, both QML and classical models struggle to detect more sophisticated adversarial perturbation attacks, which subtly alter data without changing its statistical properties. Although QML performed poorly against this attack with around 45%-65% accuracy, it still outperformed classical algorithms in some cases.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2025.

Builds on

3 of 22 references.

References · 3

  1. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  2. 2020Data Poisoning Attacks on Federated Machine Learningcited by 58
  3. 2024Anomaly Detection for Real-World Cyber-Physical Security using Quantum Hybrid Support Vector Machinescited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.