Delta -- Contrastive Decoding Mitigates Text Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities in natural language processing but remain prone to hallucinations, generating factually incorrect or fabricated content. This issue undermines their reliability, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and legal advisory. To address this challenge, we propose Delta, an inference-time method that reduces hallucinations without requiring model retraining or additional data. Delta works by randomly masking parts of the input prompt and contrasting the output distributions for the original and masked inputs, effectively suppressing hallucinations through inference-only computations. We evaluate Delta on context-rich question-answering benchmarks, achieving absolute improvements of approximately 3 and 6 percentage points on SQuAD v1.1 and v2, respectively, and 7 and 2 percentage points on TriviaQA and Natural Questions under-sampling decoding. Delta also improves the no-answer exact match score on SQuAD v2 by over ten percentage points, demonstrating its effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations arising from contextual ambiguity. These results highlight Delta as a computationally efficient and scalable approach for improving the reliability of LLMs in real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2025.
Builds on
16 of 19 references.
References · 16
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 688
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
- 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
- 2023SpQR: A Sparse-Quantized Representation for Near-Lossless LLM Weight Compressioncited by 367
- 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 332
4 more
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
- 2023Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Taskscited by 169
- 2023Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback: Learning Dynamic Choices via Pessimismcited by 69
- 2024LLaVA-Gemma: Accelerating Multimodal Foundation Models with a Compact Language Modelcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Reducing Object Hallucination in Large Audio-Language Models via Audio-Aware Decodingcited by 24
- 2026Temporal Contrastive Decoding: A Training-Free Method for Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Thinking, Faithful and Stable: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMscited by 0
- 2026Temporal Guidance for Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Temporal Contrastive Decoding: A Training-Free Method for Large Audio-Language Models16 Apr 2026
- 2026Temporal Guidance for Large Language Models29 Jan 2026
- 2025Thinking, Faithful and Stable: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs19 Nov 2025
- 2025Reducing Object Hallucination in Large Audio-Language Models via Audio-Aware Decoding8 Jun 2025