mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ApplE: A Modular Ontology of Applied Ethics and Event Context for Ethical Decision Modeling

arXiv 2502.05110 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Applied ethics applies ethical decision-making to domain-specific contexts using contextual information such as agents, actions, temporal and spatial settings, and theoretical constructs such as utility, virtues, rights, and duties. However, representing an ethical decision is challenging as it may be abstract, context-sensitive, and semantically heterogeneous. Nevertheless, important ethical and contextual factors can be formally modeled to support structured ethical reasoning. Knowledge representation and reasoning provide a mechanism to translate abstract ethical concepts into machine-interpretable conceptual structures in the context of an event. To achieve this, we propose ApplE, an Applied Ethics ontology that models ethical theory and event context within a unified and modular conceptual framework for ethical decision-making. The ontology was developed using a modified version of the Simplified Agile Methodology for Ontology Development (SAMOD), which facilitates iterative refinement of classes and relationships, as well as the participation of a domain expert. The modular development of ApplE combines Ethics Theory with Event Context to capture semantic relationships between ethical principles, agents, actions, consequences, intentions, and domains. Using ApplE, we modeled a use case from the medical domain to demonstrate the ontology's representational expressivity and reasoning capabilities. In addition to ontological reasoning and consistency checks, ApplE is also evaluated using the three-fold testing process of SAMOD. ApplE follows the FAIR principles and is positioned to be used as a reusable semantic and conceptual modeling resource for ethical AI systems and ontology-driven applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2025.

Builds on

4 of 70 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  2. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
  3. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 349
  4. 2017A Low-Cost Ethics Shaping Approach for Designing Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Advancing Automated Ethical Profiling in SE: a Zero-Shot Evaluation of LLM Reasoning
  2. 2026Beyond Binary Moral Judgment: Modeling Ethical Pluralism in AI
  3. 2025The Convergent Ethics of AI? Analyzing Moral Foundation Priorities in Large Language Models with a Multi-Framework Approach
  4. 2026ETHOS: Towards a Modular Ethics Framework for Clinical Multi-Agent Systems
  5. 2025Are Language Models Consequentialist or Deontological Moral Reasoners?
  6. 2025The Staircase of Ethics: Probing LLM Value Priorities through Multi-Step Induction to Complex Moral Dilemmas
  7. 2025Auditing the Ethical Logic of Generative AI Models
  8. 2023Rethinking Machine Ethics -- Can LLMs Perform Moral Reasoning through the Lens of Moral Theories?