mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Nearly Tight Bounds for Cross-Learning Contextual Bandits with Graphical Feedback

arXiv 2502.04678 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Repeated first-price auctions are contextual decision problems with censored but reusable feedback: after submitting a bid, a learner can infer the outcomes of related bids and evaluate them under different private values. This structure motivates cross-learning contextual bandits with graphical feedback, where playing an arm reveals the losses of its out-neighbors in every context. A central open question was whether, under i.i.d. contexts and a fixed strongly observable feedback graph with independence number α, one can remove every polynomial dependence on the number of contexts while attaining the classical graphical-bandit rate widetilde O(√α T). The question was open even for stochastic losses and graphs in which every arm has a self-loop. We answer it affirmatively under the stronger model of oblivious adversarial losses and for all strongly observable graphs, including those with arms without self-loops. The key obstruction is that a frequently played no-self-loop arm can nevertheless have a vanishing observation probability. Our algorithm isolates one such arm per epoch, uses a pessimistic correction to cancel its first-order estimation drift, and shifts the losses in the FTRL analysis to control the resulting quadratic term. It achieves expected regret widetilde O(√α T). Controlled synthetic experiments show the benefit of combining graph feedback with cross-learning and exhibit the predicted scaling in both T and α. The main theorem is formalized in Lean in an end-to-end development exceeding 100,000 lines of Lean code. The formalization and experiment artifacts are available in the GitHub repository: https://github.com/RuiyuanHuang/graphical-cross-learning-review-artifact.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2025.

Builds on

17 of 21 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic banditscited by 120
  2. 2015Online Learning with Feedback Graphs: Beyond Banditscited by 80
  3. 2020Optimal No-regret Learning in Repeated First-price Auctionscited by 33
  4. 2020Learning to Bid Optimally and Efficiently in Adversarial First-price Auctionscited by 33
  5. 2018Contextual Bandits with Cross-learningcited by 31
  6. 2019Feedback graph regret bounds for Thompson Sampling and UCBcited by 17
  7. 2021Understanding Bandits with Graph Feedbackcited by 14
  8. 2023Learning to Bid in Repeated First-Price Auctions with Budgetscited by 14
  9. 2022No-regret Learning in Repeated First-Price Auctions with Budget Constraintscited by 9
  10. 2024No-Regret Algorithms in non-Truthful Auctions with Budget and ROI Constraintscited by 9
  11. 2024Optimal cross-learning for contextual bandits with unknown context distributionscited by 7
  12. 2024Efficient Contextual Bandits with Uninformed Feedback Graphscited by 6
5 more
  1. 2022Improved High-Probability Regret for Adversarial Bandits with Time-Varying Feedback Graphscited by 5
  2. 2024Stochastic contextual bandits with graph feedback: from independence number to MAS numbercited by 5
  3. 2025Learning to Bid in Non-Stationary Repeated First-Price Auctionscited by 5
  4. 2024Graph Feedback Bandits with Similar Armscited by 2
  5. 2024High Probability Bound for Cross-Learning Contextual Bandits with Unknown Context Distributionscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.