mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantification of Biodiversity from Historical Survey Text with LLM-based Best-Worst Scaling

arXiv 2502.04022 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we evaluate methods to determine the frequency of species via quantity estimation from historical survey text. To that end, we formulate classification tasks and finally show that this problem can be adequately framed as a regression task using Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) with Large Language Models (LLMs). We test Ministral-8B, DeepSeek-V3, and GPT-4, finding that the latter two have reasonable agreement with humans and each other. We conclude that this approach is more cost-effective and similarly robust compared to a fine-grained multi-class approach, allowing automated quantity estimation across species.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.

Builds on

4 of 25 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Best-Worst Scaling More Reliable than Rating Scales: A Case Study on Sentiment Intensity Annotationcited by 77
  4. 2020Identifying Spurious Correlations for Robust Text Classificationcited by 59

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.