Rethinking Residual Distribution in Locate-then-Edit Model Editing
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Model editing enables targeted updates to the knowledge of large language models (LLMs) with minimal retraining. Among existing approaches, locate-then-edit methods constitute a prominent paradigm: they first identify critical layers, then compute residuals at the final critical layer based on the target edit, and finally apply least-squares-based multi-layer updates via residual distribution. While empirically effective, we identify a counterintuitive failure mode: residual distribution, a core mechanism in these methods, introduces weight shift errors that undermine editing precision. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we show that such errors increase with the distribution distance, batch size, and edit sequence length, ultimately leading to inaccurate or suboptimal edits. To address this, we propose the Boundary Layer UpdatE (BLUE) strategy to enhance locate-then-edit methods. Sequential batch editing experiments on three LLMs and two datasets demonstrate that BLUE not only delivers an average performance improvement of 35.59%, significantly advancing the state of the art in model editing, but also enhances the preservation of LLMs' general capabilities. Our code is available at https://github.com/xpq-tech/BLUE.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2025.
Builds on
8 of 36 references.
References · 8
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
- 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 426
- 2020Modifying Memories in Transformer Modelscited by 224
- 2024A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Modelscited by 163
- 2023A Survey on Knowledge Editing of Neural Networkscited by 34
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Are We Evaluating the Edit Locality of LLM Model Editing Properly?cited by 4
- 2026From Backward Spreading to Forward Replay: Revisiting Target Construction in LLM Parameter Editingcited by 2
- 2026MetaKE: Meta-Learning for Knowledge Editing Toward a Better Accuracy-Editability Trade-offcited by 0
- 2026The Tokens Remember: When Tokenization Bypasses Knowledge Editing and Unlearningcited by 0
- 2026The Tokens Remember: When Tokenization Bypasses Knowledge Editing and Unlearning24 Sep 2026
- 2026From Backward Spreading to Forward Replay: Revisiting Target Construction in LLM Parameter Editing1 May 2026
- 2026MetaKE: Meta-Learning for Knowledge Editing Toward a Better Accuracy-Editability Trade-off13 Mar 2026
- 2026Are We Evaluating the Edit Locality of LLM Model Editing Properly?24 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024The Butterfly Effect of Model Editing: Few Edits Can Trigger Large Language Models Collapse
- 2026The Labyrinth and the Thread: Rethinking Regularizations in Sequential Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models
- 2025EvoEdit: Evolving Null-space Alignment for Robust and Efficient Knowledge Editing
- 2026More Edits, More Stable: Understanding the Lifelong Normalization in Sequential Model Editing
- 2024Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing
- 2026Knowledge Editing for Masked Diffusion Language Models
- 2025CoME: An Unlearning-based Approach to Conflict-free Model Editing
- 2025InComeS: Integrating Compression and Selection Mechanisms into LLMs for Efficient Model Editing