Efficient Optimal PAC Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in the binary classification setting by Hanneke [2016b] and Larsen [2023] have resulted in optimal PAC learners. These learners leverage, respectively, a clever deterministic subsampling scheme and the classic heuristic of bagging Breiman [1996]. Both optimal PAC learners use, as a subroutine, the natural algorithm of empirical risk minimization. Consequently, the computational cost of these optimal PAC learners is tied to that of the empirical risk minimizer algorithm. In this work, we seek to provide an alternative perspective on the computational cost imposed by the link to the empirical risk minimizer algorithm. To this end, we show the existence of an optimal PAC learner, which offers a different tradeoff in terms of the computational cost induced by the empirical risk minimizer.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025On Agnostic PAC Learning in the Small Error Regimecited by 5
- 2026The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC Learningcited by 2
- 2026A Fine-Grained Understanding of Uniform Convergence for Halfspacescited by 0
- 2026The Interplay Between Interpolation and Aggregation in Regression: Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 0
- 2026The Interplay Between Interpolation and Aggregation in Regression: Optimal Sample Complexity28 May 2026
- 2026A Fine-Grained Understanding of Uniform Convergence for Halfspaces7 May 2026
- 2026The Sample Complexity of Replicable Realizable PAC Learning23 Feb 2026
- 2025On Agnostic PAC Learning in the Small Error Regime13 Feb 2025