TD-M(PC)2: Improving Temporal Difference MPC Through Policy Constraint
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms that combine model-based planning and learned value/policy prior have gained significant recognition for their high data efficiency and superior performance in continuous control. However, we discover that existing methods that rely on standard SAC-style policy iteration for value learning, directly using data generated by the planner, often result in persistent value overestimation. Through theoretical analysis and experiments, we argue that this issue is deeply rooted in the structural policy mismatch between the data generation policy that is always bootstrapped by the planner and the learned policy prior. To mitigate such a mismatch in a minimalist way, we propose a policy regularization term reducing out-of-distribution (OOD) queries, thereby improving value learning. Our method involves minimum changes on top of existing frameworks and requires no additional computation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach improves performance over baselines such as TD-MPC2 by large margins, particularly in 61-DoF humanoid tasks. View qualitative results at https://darthutopian.github.io/tdmpcsquare/.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 8.
12 papers.
- 2025Learning Massively Multitask World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 11
- 2025Bootstrap Off-policy with World Modelcited by 6
- 2026The Surprising Difficulty of Search in Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2025Residual Policy Gradient: A Reward View of KL-regularized Objectivecited by 2
- 2025A KL-regularization Framework for Learning to Plan with Adaptive Priorscited by 2
- 2026EfficientTDMPC: Improved MPC Objectives for Sample-Efficient Continuous Controlcited by 2
- 2026Dream-MPC: Gradient-Based Model Predictive Control with Latent Imaginationcited by 1
- 2026RAY-TOLD: Ray-Based Latent Dynamics for Dense Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance with TDMPCcited by 0
- 2026Scaling World-Model Reinforcement Learning Through Diffusion Policy Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026V-Simba: Unleashing the Architectural Potential of RL in Visual Continuous Controlcited by 0
- 2026GEM-MPC: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Expert-Guided Planningcited by 0
- 2026Think Fast, Plan Selectively: Adaptive Deliberation for Efficient Data-Driven MPCcited by 0
- 2026Think Fast, Plan Selectively: Adaptive Deliberation for Efficient Data-Driven MPC26 Sep 2026
- 2026GEM-MPC: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Expert-Guided Planning18 Sep 2026
- 2026V-Simba: Unleashing the Architectural Potential of RL in Visual Continuous Control8 Aug 2026
- 2026Scaling World-Model Reinforcement Learning Through Diffusion Policy Optimization25 May 2026
- 2026EfficientTDMPC: Improved MPC Objectives for Sample-Efficient Continuous Control15 May 2026
- 2026Dream-MPC: Gradient-Based Model Predictive Control with Latent Imagination6 May 2026
- 2026RAY-TOLD: Ray-Based Latent Dynamics for Dense Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance with TDMPC30 Apr 2026
- 2026The Surprising Difficulty of Search in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning29 Jan 2026
- 2025Learning Massively Multitask World Models for Continuous Control24 Nov 2025
- 2025Bootstrap Off-policy with World Model1 Nov 2025
- 2025A KL-regularization Framework for Learning to Plan with Adaptive Priors5 Oct 2025
- 2025Residual Policy Gradient: A Reward View of KL-regularized Objective14 Mar 2025