GHOST: Gaussian Hypothesis Open-Set Technique
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluations of large-scale recognition methods typically focus on overall performance. While this approach is common, it often fails to provide insights into performance across individual classes, which can lead to fairness issues and misrepresentation. Addressing these gaps is crucial for accurately assessing how well methods handle novel or unseen classes and ensuring a fair evaluation. To address fairness in Open-Set Recognition (OSR), we demonstrate that per-class performance can vary dramatically. We introduce Gaussian Hypothesis Open Set Technique (GHOST), a novel hyperparameter-free algorithm that models deep features using class-wise multivariate Gaussian distributions with diagonal covariance matrices. We apply Z-score normalization to logits to mitigate the impact of feature magnitudes that deviate from the model's expectations, thereby reducing the likelihood of the network assigning a high score to an unknown sample. We evaluate GHOST across multiple ImageNet-1K pre-trained deep networks and test it with four different unknown datasets. Using standard metrics such as AUOSCR, AUROC and FPR95, we achieve statistically significant improvements, advancing the state-of-the-art in large-scale OSR. Source code is provided online.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 703
- 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 533
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
12 more
- 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
- 2018Reducing Network Agnostophobiacited by 165
- 2017Generative OpenMax for Multi-Class Open Set Classificationcited by 157
- 2023In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluationcited by 132
- 2021Learning Placeholders for Open-Set Recognitioncited by 121
- 2018Mean Field Analysis of Neural Networks: A Central Limit Theoremcited by 107
- 2015The Extreme Value Machinecited by 78
- 2023Scaling for Training Time and Post-hoc Out-of-distribution Detection Enhancementcited by 77
- 2020A Mean-field Analysis of Deep ResNet and Beyond: Towards Provable Optimization Via Overparameterization From Depthcited by 56
- 2022Accurate Fairness: Improving Individual Fairness without Trading Accuracycited by 16
- 2023Unlocking the Power of Open Set : A New Perspective for Open-Set Noisy Label Learningcited by 8
- 2024Large-Scale Evaluation of Open-Set Image Classification Techniquescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.