Is In-Context Universality Enough? MLPs are Also Universal In-Context
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The success of transformers is often linked to their ability to perform in-context learning. Recent work shows that transformers are universal in context, capable of approximating any real-valued continuous function of a context (a probability measure over Xsubseteq ℝd) and a query x∈ X. This raises the question: Does in-context universality explain their advantage over classical models? We answer this in the negative by proving that MLPs with trainable activation functions are also universal in-context. This suggests the transformer's success is likely due to other factors like inductive bias or training stability.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Pretrain-Test Task Alignment Governs Generalization in In-Context Learningcited by 6
- 2025Beyond Universal Approximation Theorems: Algorithmic Uniform Approximation by Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Datacited by 1
- 2026Adaptivity Under Realizability Constraints: Comparing In-Context and Agentic Learningcited by 0
- 2026Adaptivity Under Realizability Constraints: Comparing In-Context and Agentic Learning6 May 2026
- 2025Pretrain-Test Task Alignment Governs Generalization in In-Context Learning30 Sep 2025
- 2025Beyond Universal Approximation Theorems: Algorithmic Uniform Approximation by Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Data31 Aug 2025