Rankify: A Comprehensive Python Toolkit for Retrieval, Re-Ranking, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval, re-ranking, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) are critical components of modern applications in information retrieval, question answering, or knowledge-based text generation. However, existing solutions are often fragmented, lacking a unified framework that easily integrates these essential processes. The absence of a standardized implementation, coupled with the complexity of retrieval and re-ranking workflows, makes it challenging for researchers to compare and evaluate different approaches in a consistent environment. While existing toolkits such as Rerankers and RankLLM provide general-purpose reranking pipelines, they often lack the flexibility required for fine-grained experimentation and benchmarking. In response to these challenges, we introduce Rankify, a powerful and modular open-source toolkit designed to unify retrieval, re-ranking, and RAG within a cohesive framework. Rankify supports a wide range of retrieval techniques, including dense and sparse retrievers, while incorporating state-of-the-art re-ranking models to enhance retrieval quality. Additionally, Rankify includes a collection of pre-retrieved datasets to facilitate benchmarking, available at Huggingface (https://huggingface.co/datasets/abdoelsayed/reranking-datasets-light). To encourage adoption and ease of integration, we provide comprehensive documentation (http://rankify.readthedocs.io/), an open-source implementation on GitHub (https://github.com/DataScienceUIBK/rankify), and a PyPI package for easy installation (https://pypi.org/project/rankify/). As a unified and lightweight framework, Rankify allows researchers and practitioners to advance retrieval and re-ranking methodologies while ensuring consistency, scalability, and ease of use.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 84 of its 126 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2025.
Builds on
84 of 126 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024AutoRAG: Automated Framework for optimization of Retrieval Augmented Generation Pipeline28 Oct
- 2024FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Research22 May
Other references · 82
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
38 more
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,054
- 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 893
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
- 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 694
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
- 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
- 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 590
- 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 571
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
- 2018Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentscited by 530
- 2021ColBERTv2: Effective and Efficient Retrieval via Lightweight Late Interactioncited by 464
- 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 425
- 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 410
- 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 396
- 2020AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questionscited by 385
- 2020Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 373
- 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 356
- 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 329
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
- 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning trackcited by 282
- 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 266
- 2022ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answerscited by 231
- 2019Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERTcited by 200
- 2020Generation-Augmented Retrieval for Open-domain Question Answeringcited by 186
- 2021RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingcited by 175
50 most cited of 82 All 82 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 7.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Modelscited by 120
- 2025Synergizing RAG and Reasoning: A Systematic Reviewcited by 27
- 2025Literature-Grounded Novelty Assessment of Scientific Ideascited by 17
- 2025Shifting from Ranking to Set Selection for Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 13
- 2025DeAR: Dual-Stage Document Reranking with Reasoning Agents via LLM Distillationcited by 11
- 2026TEMPO: A Realistic Multi-Domain Benchmark for Temporal Reasoning-Intensive Retrievalcited by 6
- 2025SciRerankBench: Benchmarking Rerankers Towards Scientific Retrieval-Augmented Generated LLMscited by 5
- 2026Are LLM-Based Retrievers Worth Their Cost? An Empirical Study of Efficiency, Robustness, and Reasoning Overheadcited by 4
- 2026Experience as a Compass: Multi-agent RAG with Evolving Orchestration and Agent Promptscited by 2
- 2026RAG without Forgetting: Continual Query-Infused Key Memorycited by 0
- 2026MARVEL: Multimodal Adaptive Reasoning-intensiVe Expand-rerank and retrievaLcited by 0
- 2026BRIDGE: Multimodal-to-Text Retrieval via Reinforcement-Learned Query Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026HIVE: Query, Hypothesize, Verify An LLM Framework for Multimodal Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval8 Apr 2026
- 2026BRIDGE: Multimodal-to-Text Retrieval via Reinforcement-Learned Query Alignment8 Apr 2026
- 2026MARVEL: Multimodal Adaptive Reasoning-intensiVe Expand-rerank and retrievaL8 Apr 2026
- 2026Are LLM-Based Retrievers Worth Their Cost? An Empirical Study of Efficiency, Robustness, and Reasoning Overhead4 Apr 2026
- 2026Experience as a Compass: Multi-agent RAG with Evolving Orchestration and Agent Prompts1 Apr 2026
- 2026RAG without Forgetting: Continual Query-Infused Key Memory5 Feb 2026
- 2026TEMPO: A Realistic Multi-Domain Benchmark for Temporal Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval14 Jan 2026
- 2025DeAR: Dual-Stage Document Reranking with Reasoning Agents via LLM Distillation23 Aug 2025
- 2025SciRerankBench: Benchmarking Rerankers Towards Scientific Retrieval-Augmented Generated LLMs12 Aug 2025
- 2025A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models17 Jul 2025
- 2025Shifting from Ranking to Set Selection for Retrieval Augmented Generation9 Jul 2025
- 2025Literature-Grounded Novelty Assessment of Scientific Ideas27 Jun 2025
1 more
- 2025Synergizing RAG and Reasoning: A Systematic Review22 Apr 2025
- 2025Synergizing RAG and Reasoning: A Systematic Reviewcited by 27
- 2025DeAR: Dual-Stage Document Reranking with Reasoning Agents via LLM Distillationcited by 11
- 2026TEMPO: A Realistic Multi-Domain Benchmark for Temporal Reasoning-Intensive Retrievalcited by 6
- 2026Are LLM-Based Retrievers Worth Their Cost? An Empirical Study of Efficiency, Robustness, and Reasoning Overheadcited by 4
- 2026MARVEL: Multimodal Adaptive Reasoning-intensiVe Expand-rerank and retrievaLcited by 0
- 2026HIVE: Query, Hypothesize, Verify An LLM Framework for Multimodal Reasoning-Intensive Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026HIVE: Query, Hypothesize, Verify An LLM Framework for Multimodal Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval8 Apr 2026
- 2026MARVEL: Multimodal Adaptive Reasoning-intensiVe Expand-rerank and retrievaL8 Apr 2026
- 2026Are LLM-Based Retrievers Worth Their Cost? An Empirical Study of Efficiency, Robustness, and Reasoning Overhead4 Apr 2026
- 2026TEMPO: A Realistic Multi-Domain Benchmark for Temporal Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval14 Jan 2026
- 2025DeAR: Dual-Stage Document Reranking with Reasoning Agents via LLM Distillation23 Aug 2025
- 2025Synergizing RAG and Reasoning: A Systematic Review22 Apr 2025
- 2025Shifting from Ranking to Set Selection for Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 13
- 2025SciRerankBench: Benchmarking Rerankers Towards Scientific Retrieval-Augmented Generated LLMscited by 5
- 2026Experience as a Compass: Multi-agent RAG with Evolving Orchestration and Agent Promptscited by 2
- 2026RAG without Forgetting: Continual Query-Infused Key Memorycited by 0
- 2026Experience as a Compass: Multi-agent RAG with Evolving Orchestration and Agent Prompts1 Apr 2026
- 2026RAG without Forgetting: Continual Query-Infused Key Memory5 Feb 2026
- 2025SciRerankBench: Benchmarking Rerankers Towards Scientific Retrieval-Augmented Generated LLMs12 Aug 2025
- 2025Shifting from Ranking to Set Selection for Retrieval Augmented Generation9 Jul 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Enhancing Q&A Text Retrieval with Ranking Models: Benchmarking, fine-tuning and deploying Rerankers for RAG
- 2025RankLLM: A Python Package for Reranking with LLMs
- 2026Beyond the Reranker: Do RAG Retrieval Enhancements Help Once a Strong Reranker Is Present?
- 2025Test-time Corpus Feedback: From Retrieval to RAG
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions
- 2024Assessing generalization capability of text ranking models in Polish
- 2025FreshStack: Building Realistic Benchmarks for Evaluating Retrieval on Technical Documents
- 2025RankArena: A Unified Platform for Evaluating Retrieval, Reranking and RAG with Human and LLM Feedback