mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Thompson Sampling with Infinite Action Spaces

arXiv 2502.02140 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper studies the Bayesian regret of the Thompson Sampling algorithm for bandit problems, building on the information-theoretic framework introduced by Russo and Van Roy (2015). Specifically, it extends the rate-distortion analysis of Dong and Van Roy (2018), which provides near-optimal bounds for linear bandits. A limitation of these results is the assumption of a finite action space. We address this by extending the analysis to settings with infinite and continuous action spaces. Additionally, we specialize our results to bandit problems with expected rewards that are Lipschitz continuous with respect to the action space, deriving a regret bound that explicitly accounts for the complexity of the action space.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2025.

Builds on

9 of 20 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
  2. 2014An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Thompson Samplingcited by 178
  3. 2014Learning to Optimize via Information-Directed Samplingcited by 168
  4. 2021Feel-Good Thompson Sampling for Contextual Bandits and Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  5. 2021Efficient First-Order Contextual Bandits: Prediction, Allocation, and Triangular Discriminationcited by 53
  6. 2018An Information-Theoretic Analysis for Thompson Sampling with Many Actionscited by 35
  7. 2019On the Performance of Thompson Sampling on Logistic Banditscited by 32
  8. 2022Lifting the Information Ratio: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Thompson Sampling for Contextual Banditscited by 19
  9. 2018Contextual bandits with surrogate losses: Margin bounds and efficient algorithmscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.