mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ASCenD-BDS: Adaptable, Stochastic and Context-aware framework for Detection of Bias, Discrimination and Stereotyping

arXiv 2502.02072 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed natural language processing but raises critical concerns about biases inherent in their deployment and use across diverse linguistic and sociocultural contexts. This paper presents a framework named ASCenD BDS (Adaptable, Stochastic and Context-aware framework for Detection of Bias, Discrimination and Stereotyping). The framework presents approach to detecting bias, discrimination, stereotyping across various categories such as gender, caste, age, disability, socioeconomic status, linguistic variations, etc., using an approach which is Adaptive, Stochastic and Context-Aware. The existing frameworks rely heavily on usage of datasets to generate scenarios for detection of Bias, Discrimination and Stereotyping. Examples include datasets such as Civil Comments, Wino Gender, WinoBias, BOLD, CrowS Pairs and BBQ. However, such an approach provides point solutions. As a result, these datasets provide a finite number of scenarios for assessment. The current framework overcomes this limitation by having features which enable Adaptability, Stochasticity, Context Awareness. Context awareness can be customized for any nation or culture or sub-culture (for example an organization's unique culture). In this paper, context awareness in the Indian context has been established. Content has been leveraged from Indian Census 2011 to have a commonality of categorization. A framework has been developed using Category, Sub-Category, STEM, X-Factor, Synonym to enable the features for Adaptability, Stochasticity and Context awareness. The framework has been described in detail in Section 3. Overall 800 plus STEMs, 10 Categories, 31 unique SubCategories were developed by a team of consultants at Saint Fox Consultancy Private Ltd. The concept has been tested out in SFCLabs as part of product development.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2025.

Builds on

15 of 19 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  5. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  6. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
  7. 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
  8. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 683
  9. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  10. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
  11. 2021Worst of Both Worlds: Biases Compound in Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 52
  12. 2024The Pursuit of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Models: A Surveycited by 13
3 more
  1. 2023A benchmark for toxic comment classification on Civil Comments datasetcited by 11
  2. 2024WinoPron: Revisiting English Winogender Schemas for Consistency, Coverage, and Grammatical Casecited by 9
  3. 2021Debiasing Multilingual Word Embeddings: A Case Study of Three Indian Languagescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.