LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and Efficient
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to a surge in both model supply and application demands. To facilitate effective matching between them, reliable, generic and efficient benchmark generators are widely needed. However, human annotators are constrained by inefficiency, and current LLM benchmark generators not only lack generalizability but also struggle with limited reliability, as they lack a comprehensive evaluation framework for validation and optimization. To fill this gap, we first propose an automated and unbiased evaluation framework, structured around four dimensions and ten criteria. Under this framework, we carefully analyze the advantages and weaknesses of directly prompting LLMs as generic benchmark generators. To enhance the reliability, we introduce a series of methods to address the identified weaknesses and integrate them as BenchMaker. Experiments across multiple LLMs and tasks confirm that BenchMaker achieves superior or comparable performance to human-annotated benchmarks on all metrics, highlighting its generalizability and reliability. More importantly, it delivers highly consistent evaluation results across 12 LLMs (0.967 Pearson correlation against MMLU-Pro), while taking only 0.005 and 0.38 minutes per sample.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2025.
Builds on
28 of 108 references.
References · 28
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 805
- 2023WizardCoder: Empowering Code Large Language Models with Evol-Instructcited by 728
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 484
16 more
- 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 397
- 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 240
- 2023Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Biascited by 230
- 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 227
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
- 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 197
- 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 100
- 2024Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 90
- 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 84
- 2019Jointly Measuring Diversity and Quality in Text Generation Modelscited by 61
- 2024Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models by Meta Probing Agentscited by 54
- 2024Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmarkcited by 29
- 2024Arena Learning: Build Data Flywheel for LLMs Post-training via Simulated Chatbot Arenacited by 26
- 2024Integrate the Essence and Eliminate the Dross: Fine-Grained Self-Consistency for Free-Form Language Generationcited by 21
- 2024Neuro-Symbolic Data Generation for Math Reasoningcited by 21
- 2024PertEval: Unveiling Real Knowledge Capacity of LLMs with Knowledge-Invariant Perturbationscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025Silencer: From Discovery to Mitigation of Self-Bias in LLM-as-Benchmark-Generatorcited by 4
- 2025From Sub-Ability Diagnosis to Human-Aligned Generation: Bridging the Gap for Text Length Control via MARKERGENcited by 2
- 2025Automating Benchmark Designcited by 2
- 2025Evaluating Compact LLMs for Zero-Shot Iberian Language Tasks on End-User Devicescited by 1
- 2025From Raw Corpora to Domain Benchmarks: Automated Evaluation of LLM Domain Expertisecited by 1
- 2026Automatically Generating Hard Math Problems from Hypothesis-Driven Error Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Automatically Generating Hard Math Problems from Hypothesis-Driven Error Analysis6 Apr 2026
- 2025Automating Benchmark Design28 Oct 2025
- 2025From Raw Corpora to Domain Benchmarks: Automated Evaluation of LLM Domain Expertise9 Jun 2025
- 2025Silencer: From Discovery to Mitigation of Self-Bias in LLM-as-Benchmark-Generator27 May 2025
- 2025Evaluating Compact LLMs for Zero-Shot Iberian Language Tasks on End-User Devices4 Apr 2025
- 2025From Sub-Ability Diagnosis to Human-Aligned Generation: Bridging the Gap for Text Length Control via MARKERGEN19 Feb 2025