Message-Passing GNNs Fail to Approximate Sparse Triangular Factorizations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been proposed as a tool for learning sparse matrix preconditioners, which are key components in accelerating linear solvers. We present theoretical and empirical evidence that message-passing GNNs are fundamentally incapable of approximating sparse triangular factorizations for classes of matrices for which high-quality preconditioners exist but require non-local dependencies. To illustrate this, we construct a set of baselines using both synthetic matrices and real-world examples from the SuiteSparse collection. Across a range of GNN architectures, including Graph Attention Networks and Graph Transformers, we observe low cosine similarity (≤0.7 in key cases) between predicted and reference factors. Our theoretical and empirical results suggest that architectural innovations beyond message-passing are necessary for applying GNNs to scientific computing tasks such as matrix factorization. Moreover, experiments demonstrate that overcoming non-locality alone is insufficient. Tailored architectures are necessary to capture the required dependencies since even a completely non-local Global Graph Transformer fails to match the proposed baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
26 of 38 references.
References · 26
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 951
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
- 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 500
- 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 471
- 2020DeeperGCN: All You Need to Train Deeper GCNscited by 249
- 2023A Survey on Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networkscited by 246
14 more
- 2023SGFormer: Simplifying and Empowering Transformers for Large-Graph Representationscited by 131
- 2020Learning Algebraic Multigrid Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 54
- 2019Deep Learning of Preconditioners for Conjugate Gradient Solvers in Urban Water Related Problemscited by 19
- 2023Neural incomplete factorization: learning preconditioners for the conjugate gradient methodcited by 18
- 2024Graph Neural Preconditioners for Iterative Solutions of Sparse Linear Systemscited by 15
- 2024Learning from Linear Algebra: A Graph Neural Network Approach to Preconditioner Design for Conjugate Gradient Solverscited by 13
- 2023MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methodscited by 12
- 2022Learning Interface Conditions in Domain Decomposition Solverscited by 11
- 2020Machine-Learned Preconditioners for Linear Solvers in Geophysical Fluid Flowscited by 10
- 2024Learning incomplete factorization preconditioners for GMREScited by 9
- 2022Neural-network preconditioners for solving the Dirac equation in lattice gauge theorycited by 6
- 2023Graph Neural Networks and Applied Linear Algebracited by 6
- 2024Generative modeling of Sparse Approximate Inverse Preconditionerscited by 2
- 2024Neural Acceleration of Incomplete Cholesky Preconditionerscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.