mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Message-Passing GNNs Fail to Approximate Sparse Triangular Factorizations

arXiv 2502.01397 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.NAcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been proposed as a tool for learning sparse matrix preconditioners, which are key components in accelerating linear solvers. We present theoretical and empirical evidence that message-passing GNNs are fundamentally incapable of approximating sparse triangular factorizations for classes of matrices for which high-quality preconditioners exist but require non-local dependencies. To illustrate this, we construct a set of baselines using both synthetic matrices and real-world examples from the SuiteSparse collection. Across a range of GNN architectures, including Graph Attention Networks and Graph Transformers, we observe low cosine similarity (≤0.7 in key cases) between predicted and reference factors. Our theoretical and empirical results suggest that architectural innovations beyond message-passing are necessary for applying GNNs to scientific computing tasks such as matrix factorization. Moreover, experiments demonstrate that overcoming non-locality alone is insufficient. Tailored architectures are necessary to capture the required dependencies since even a completely non-local Global Graph Transformer fails to match the proposed baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  4. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  5. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
  6. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  7. 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 951
  8. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  9. 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 500
  10. 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 471
  11. 2020DeeperGCN: All You Need to Train Deeper GCNscited by 249
  12. 2023A Survey on Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networkscited by 246
14 more
  1. 2023SGFormer: Simplifying and Empowering Transformers for Large-Graph Representationscited by 131
  2. 2020Learning Algebraic Multigrid Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 54
  3. 2019Deep Learning of Preconditioners for Conjugate Gradient Solvers in Urban Water Related Problemscited by 19
  4. 2023Neural incomplete factorization: learning preconditioners for the conjugate gradient methodcited by 18
  5. 2024Graph Neural Preconditioners for Iterative Solutions of Sparse Linear Systemscited by 15
  6. 2024Learning from Linear Algebra: A Graph Neural Network Approach to Preconditioner Design for Conjugate Gradient Solverscited by 13
  7. 2023MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methodscited by 12
  8. 2022Learning Interface Conditions in Domain Decomposition Solverscited by 11
  9. 2020Machine-Learned Preconditioners for Linear Solvers in Geophysical Fluid Flowscited by 10
  10. 2024Learning incomplete factorization preconditioners for GMREScited by 9
  11. 2022Neural-network preconditioners for solving the Dirac equation in lattice gauge theorycited by 6
  12. 2023Graph Neural Networks and Applied Linear Algebracited by 6
  13. 2024Generative modeling of Sparse Approximate Inverse Preconditionerscited by 2
  14. 2024Neural Acceleration of Incomplete Cholesky Preconditionerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.