PtyGenography: using generative models for regularization of the phase retrieval problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In phase retrieval and similar inverse problems, the stability of solutions across different noise levels is crucial for applications. One approach to promote it is using signal priors in a form of a generative model as a regularization, at the expense of introducing a bias in the reconstruction. In this paper, we explore and compare the reconstruction properties of classical and generative inverse problem formulations. We propose a new unified reconstruction approach that mitigates overfitting to the generative model for varying noise levels.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
8 of 26 references.
References · 8
- 2018Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Priorcited by 73
- 2017Phase recovery and holographic image reconstruction using deep learning in neural networkscited by 54
- 2017Lensless computational imaging through deep learningcited by 44
- 2019Learning to Synthesize: Robust Phase Retrieval at Low Photon countscited by 16
- 2013Sparse Phase Retrieval: Uniqueness Guarantees and Recovery Algorithmscited by 8
- 2023Noise-robust latent vector reconstruction in ptychography using deep generative modelscited by 4
- 2015On Lipschitz Analysis and Lipschitz Synthesis for the Phase Retrieval Problemcited by 2
- 2023Phase retrieval with semi-algebraic and ReLU neural network priorscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.