Skewed Memorization in Large Language Models: Quantification and Decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Memorization in Large Language Models (LLMs) poses privacy and security risks, as models may unintentionally reproduce sensitive or copyrighted data. Existing analyses focus on average-case scenarios, often neglecting the highly skewed distribution of memorization. This paper examines memorization in LLM supervised fine-tuning (SFT), exploring its relationships with training duration, dataset size, and inter-sample similarity. By analyzing memorization probabilities over sequence lengths, we link this skewness to the token generation process, offering insights for estimating memorization and comparing it to established metrics. Through theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation, we provide a comprehensive understanding of memorization behaviors and propose strategies to detect and mitigate risks, contributing to more privacy-preserving LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025TransECG: Leveraging Transformers for Explainable ECG Re-identification Risk Analysiscited by 3
- 2026Why Some Models Resist Unlearning: A Linear Stability Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026On the Memorization Behavior of LLMs in Generative Recommendation: Observations, Implications, and Training Strategiescited by 0
- 2026On the Memorization Behavior of LLMs in Generative Recommendation: Observations, Implications, and Training Strategies15 Jun 2026
- 2026Why Some Models Resist Unlearning: A Linear Stability Perspective3 Feb 2026
- 2025TransECG: Leveraging Transformers for Explainable ECG Re-identification Risk Analysis11 Mar 2025