An Inquiry into Datacenter TCO for LLM Inference with FP8
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) continue to scale, the high power consumption of AI accelerators in datacenters presents significant challenges, substantially increasing the total cost of ownership (TCO) for cloud service providers (CSPs) that provide LLM inference. In this work, we analyze the computational characteristics of LLM inference from a TCO perspective and present a generalizable framework to compare AI accelerators across diverse operational requirements. Using this model, we investigate key workload characteristics influencing TCO for AI accelerators from Intel (Gaudi 2 & 3) and NVIDIA (H100 & H200), especially thin GEMM utilization and FP8 quantization. In particular, as FP8 emerges as the baseline precision for next-generation LLMs, understanding how different architectures implement and benefit from low-precision computation is increasingly critical. Throughput on thin GEMMs has a greater impact on TCO than theoretical hardware peak throughput because the memory-bound decode phase is dominated by GEMV-like computations. We find that Gaudi HPUs achieve superior utilization on thin GEMMs compared to their counterparts, especially in FP8-quantized models. Our result underscores the importance of empirical, workload-level analysis in evaluating accelerator performance, rather than relying solely on theoretical hardware specifications. By studying the interaction between power consumption, quantization strategies, and hardware architecture, we provide insights to support informed deployment decisions and guide future accelerator designs aimed at improving the TCO of LLM inference workloads.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
30 of 56 references.
References · 30
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
- 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,338
- 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,311
- 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,093
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
- 2021Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LMcited by 621
18 more
- 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 610
- 2024QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMscited by 598
- 2024DistServe: Disaggregating Prefill and Decoding for Goodput-optimized Large Language Model Servingcited by 595
- 2023Splitwise: Efficient generative LLM inference using phase splittingcited by 536
- 2024SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotationscited by 446
- 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 277
- 2023Atom: Low-bit Quantization for Efficient and Accurate LLM Servingcited by 255
- 2019A Study of BFLOAT16 for Deep Learning Trainingcited by 227
- 2024QServe: W4A8KV4 Quantization and System Co-design for Efficient LLM Servingcited by 200
- 2024No Token Left Behind: Reliable KV Cache Compression via Importance-Aware Mixed Precision Quantizationcited by 99
- 2021Breaking the Computation and Communication Abstraction Barrier in Distributed Machine Learning Workloadscited by 40
- 2024M'elange: Cost Efficient Large Language Model Serving by Exploiting GPU Heterogeneitycited by 30
- 2023Efficient Post-training Quantization with FP8 Formatscited by 29
- 2024When Precision Meets Position: BFloat16 Breaks Down RoPE in Long-Context Trainingcited by 15
- 2024Sustainable Supercomputing for AI: GPU Power Capping at HPC Scalecited by 9
- 2024SCOOT: SLO-Oriented Performance Tuning for LLM Inference Enginescited by 9
- 2024HLAT: High-quality Large Language Model Pre-trained on AWS Trainiumcited by 7
- 2024Debunking the CUDA Myth Towards GPU-based AI Systemscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025A Cost-Benefit Analysis of On-Premise Large Language Model Deployment: Breaking Even with Commercial LLM Servicescited by 15
- 2026Position: LLM Serving Needs Mathematical Optimization and Algorithmic Foundations, Not Just Heuristicscited by 1
- 2025Adaptive Data Flywheel: Applying MAPE Control Loops to AI Agent Improvementcited by 0
- 2026DPS: Dual-Mode Precision LLM Serving with Semi-Unified Memorycited by 0
- 2026DPS: Dual-Mode Precision LLM Serving with Semi-Unified Memory28 Sep 2026
- 2026Position: LLM Serving Needs Mathematical Optimization and Algorithmic Foundations, Not Just Heuristics2 May 2026
- 2025Adaptive Data Flywheel: Applying MAPE Control Loops to AI Agent Improvement30 Oct 2025
- 2025A Cost-Benefit Analysis of On-Premise Large Language Model Deployment: Breaking Even with Commercial LLM Services30 Aug 2025