AutoDDG: Automated Dataset Description Generation using Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The proliferation of datasets across open data portals and enterprise data lakes presents an opportunity for deriving data-driven insights. Widely-used dataset search systems rely on keyword search over dataset metadata, including descriptions, to support discovery. Therefore, when these descriptions are incomplete, missing, or inconsistent with dataset contents, findability is severely compromised. To improve findability, we introduce AutoDDG, a framework that automatically generates descriptions of tabular data. By adopting a data-driven approach to summarize dataset contents and leveraging large language models (LLMs) to enrich summaries with semantic information and produce human-readable text, AutoDDG derives descriptions that are comprehensive, accurate, readable, and concise. A critical challenge in this problem is evaluating the effectiveness of description generation methods and assessing the quality of the generated descriptions. We propose a comprehensive evaluation methodology that combines retrieval, reference-based, and reference-free assessment, with human validation. Our experimental results using new benchmarks demonstrate that AutoDDG generates high-quality, accurate descriptions at scale, significantly improving dataset retrieval performance across diverse use cases. AutoDDG is publicly available at https://github.com/VIDA-NYU/AutoDDG.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.
8 papers.
- 2025A Survey of Data Agents: Emerging Paradigm or Overstated Hype?cited by 30
- 2026Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMscited by 9
- 2026A Reference Architecture for Agentic Hybrid Retrieval in Dataset Searchcited by 1
- 2026LakeQA: An Exploratory QA Benchmark over a Million-Scale Data Lakecited by 1
- 2026PIPER: Content-Based Table Search via profiling and LLM-Generated Pseudoqueriescited by 0
- 2026SANA: What Matters for QA Agents over Massive Data Lakes?cited by 0
- 2026Faithful or Findable? Evaluating LLM-Generated Metadata for RDF Dataset Searchcited by 0
- 2026MosaicJoin: Compact Semantic Sketches for Value-Level Join Discoverycited by 0
- 2026MosaicJoin: Compact Semantic Sketches for Value-Level Join Discovery23 Jul 2026
- 2026Faithful or Findable? Evaluating LLM-Generated Metadata for RDF Dataset Search7 Jul 2026
- 2026SANA: What Matters for QA Agents over Massive Data Lakes?11 Jun 2026
- 2026LakeQA: An Exploratory QA Benchmark over a Million-Scale Data Lake9 Jun 2026
- 2026PIPER: Content-Based Table Search via profiling and LLM-Generated Pseudoqueries18 May 2026
- 2026A Reference Architecture for Agentic Hybrid Retrieval in Dataset Search28 Mar 2026
- 2026Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs22 Jan 2026
- 2025A Survey of Data Agents: Emerging Paradigm or Overstated Hype?27 Oct 2025