mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HackerRank-ASTRA: Evaluating Correctness & Consistency of Large Language Models on cross-domain multi-file project problems

arXiv 2502.00226 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2025cs.LG cs.SEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating the real-world applicability of large language models (LLMs) provides valuable insights for their development and use in software development tasks. Existing benchmarks often focus on standalone coding problems or specific libraries, overlooking multi-file, project-based scenarios and lacking a rigorous evaluation of consistency. The HackerRank-ASTRA Benchmark introduces project-based coding problems that mirror real-world scenarios. It evaluates model consistency through 32 runs (k = 32) and median standard deviation while incorporating taxonomy-level analysis to assess sub-skill capabilities. Initial evaluations on 65 problems show that the top three models -- o1, o1-preview, and Claude-3.5-Sonnet-1022 -- achieved comparable average scores of 75%, with no statistically significant differences in performance. Notably, Claude-3.5-Sonnet-1022 demonstrated the highest consistency across problems, with low variability (SD = 0.0497), which was statistically significant compared to other models, highlighting its reliability for real-world software development tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.