mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast exact recovery of noisy matrix from few entries: the infinity norm approach

arXiv 2501.19224 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2025math.ST cs.LG math.COcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The matrix recovery (completion) problem, a central problem in data science and theoretical computer science, is to recover a matrix A from a relatively small sample of entries. While such a task is impossible in general, it has been shown that one can recover A exactly in polynomial time, with high probability, from a random subset of entries, under three (basic and necessary) assumptions: (1) the rank of A is very small compared to its dimensions (low rank), (2) A has delocalized singular vectors (incoherence), and (3) the sample size is sufficiently large. There are many different algorithms for the task, including convex optimization by Candes, Tao and Recht (2009), alternating projection by Hardt and Wooters (2014) and low rank approximation with gradient descent by Keshavan, Montanari and Oh (2009, 2010). In applications, it is more realistic to assume that data is noisy. In this case, these approaches provide an approximate recovery with small root mean square error. However, it is hard to transform such an approximate recovery to an exact one. Recently, results by Abbe et al. (2017) and Bhardwaj et al. (2023) concerning approximation in the infinity norm showed that we can achieve exact recovery even in the noisy case, given that the ground matrix has bounded precision. Beyond the three basic assumptions above, they required either the condition number of A is small (Abbe et al.) or the gap between consecutive singular values is large (Bhardwaj et al.). In this paper, we remove these extra spectral assumptions. As a result, we obtain a simple algorithm for exact recovery in the noisy case, under only the three basic assumptions. This is the first such algorithm. To analyse this algorithm, we introduce a contour integration argument which is totally different from all previous methods and may be of independent interest.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.

Builds on

9 of 44 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021Causal Matrix Completioncited by 45
  2. 2013Understanding Alternating Minimization for Matrix Completioncited by 32
  3. 2019On Robustness of Principal Component Regressioncited by 28
  4. 2017Estimating Mixed Memberships with Sharp Eigenvector Deviationscited by 22
  5. 2014Fast matrix completion without the condition numbercited by 17
  6. 2021Matrix completion with data-dependent missingness probabilitiescited by 15
  7. 2014Universal Matrix Completioncited by 11
  8. 2019A Survey on Matrix Completion: Perspective of Signal Processingcited by 6
  9. 2023Matrix Perturbation: Davis-Kahan in the Infinity Normcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.