mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predictive Prompt Analysis

arXiv 2501.18883 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2025cs.SE cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are machine learning models that have seen widespread adoption due to their capability of handling previously difficult tasks. LLMs, due to their training, are sensitive to how exactly a question is presented, also known as prompting. However, prompting well is challenging, as it has been difficult to uncover principles behind prompting -- generally, trial-and-error is the most common way of improving prompts, despite its significant computational cost. In this context, we argue it would be useful to perform `predictive prompt analysis', in which an automated technique would perform a quick analysis of a prompt and predict how the LLM would react to it, relative to a goal provided by the user. As a demonstration of the concept, we present Syntactic Prevalence Analyzer (SPA), a predictive prompt analysis approach based on sparse autoencoders (SAEs). SPA accurately predicted how often an LLM would generate target syntactic structures during code synthesis, with up to 0.994 Pearson correlation between the predicted and actual prevalence of the target structure. At the same time, SPA requires only 0.4% of the time it takes to run the LLM on a benchmark. As LLMs are increasingly used during and integrated into modern software development, our proposed predictive prompt analysis concept has the potential to significantly ease the use of LLMs for both practitioners and researchers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.

Builds on

10 of 20 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  3. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  4. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  5. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
  6. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  7. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
  8. 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 428
  9. 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 389
  10. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.