mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Estimating the Probability of Sampling a Trained Neural Network at Random

arXiv 2501.18812 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2025cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present and analyze an algorithm for estimating the size, under a Gaussian or uniform measure, of a localized neighborhood in neural network parameter space with behavior similar to an ``anchor'' point. We refer to this as the "local volume" of the anchor. We adapt an existing basin-volume estimator, which is very fast but in many cases only provides a lower bound. We show that this lower bound can be improved with an importance-sampling method using gradient information that is already provided by popular optimizers. The negative logarithm of local volume can also be interpreted as a measure of the anchor network's information content. As expected for a measure of complexity, this quantity increases during language model training. We find that overfit, badly-generalizing neighborhoods are smaller, indicating a more complex learned behavior. This smaller volume can also be interpreted in an MDL sense as suboptimal compression. Our results are consistent with a picture of generalization we call the "volume hypothesis": that neural net training produces good generalization primarily because the architecture gives simple functions more volume in parameter space, and the optimizer samples from the low-loss manifold in a volume-sensitive way. We believe that fast local-volume estimators are a promising practical metric of network complexity and architectural inductive bias for interpretability purposes.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2025.

Builds on

14 of 22 references.

References · 14

  1. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  2. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
  3. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  4. 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
  5. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 466
  6. 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 300
  7. 2021Loss Surface Simplexes for Mode Connecting Volumes and Fast Ensemblingcited by 75
  8. 2019Understanding Generalization through Visualizationscited by 54
  9. 2023The Local Learning Coefficient: A Singularity-Aware Complexity Measurecited by 51
  10. 2020Is SGD a Bayesian sampler? Well, almostcited by 50
  11. 2024Neural Redshift: Random Networks are not Random Functionscited by 43
  12. 2024Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficientcited by 40
2 more
  1. 2022HesScale: Scalable Computation of Hessian Diagonalscited by 8
  2. 2024Understanding Gradient Descent through the Training Jacobiancited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.