A Comprehensive Analysis on Machine Learning based Methods for Lung Cancer Level Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lung cancer is a major issue in worldwide public health, requiring early diagnosis using stable techniques. This work begins a thorough investigation of the use of machine learning (ML) methods for precise classification of lung cancer stages. A cautious analysis is performed to overcome overfitting issues in model performance, taking into account minimum child weight and learning rate. A set of machine learning (ML) models including XGBoost (XGB), LGBM, Adaboost, Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), CatBoost, and k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) are run methodically and contrasted. Furthermore, the correlation between features and targets is examined using the deep neural network (DNN) model and thus their capability in detecting complex patternsis established. It is argued that several ML models can be capable of classifying lung cancer stages with great accuracy. In spite of the complexity of DNN architectures, traditional ML models like XGBoost, LGBM, and Logistic Regression excel with superior performance. The models perform better than the others in lung cancer prediction on the complete set of comparative metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F-1 score
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2025.
Builds on
4 of 51 references.
References · 4
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2020A Survey of Methods for Managing the Classification and Solution of Data Imbalance Problemcited by 5
- 2023Improving diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer using vision transformers: A scoping reviewcited by 2
- 2024InceptionCapsule: Inception-Resnet and CapsuleNet with self-attention for medical image Classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.