Statistical Analysis of Risk Assessment Factors and Metrics to Evaluate Radicalisation in Twitter
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Nowadays, Social Networks have become an essential communication tools producing a large amount of information about their users and their interactions, which can be analysed with Data Mining methods. In the last years, Social Networks are being used to radicalise people. In this paper, we study the performance of a set of indicators and their respective metrics, devoted to assess the risk of radicalisation of a precise individual on three different datasets. Keyword-based metrics, even though depending on the written language, performs well when measuring frustration, perception of discrimination as well as declaration of negative and positive ideas about Western society and Jihadism, respectively. However, metrics based on frequent habits such as writing ellipses are not well enough to characterise a user in risk of radicalisation. The paper presents a detailed description of both, the set of indicators used to asses the radicalisation in Social Networks and the set of datasets used to evaluate them. Finally, an experimental study over these datasets are carried out to evaluate the performance of the metrics considered.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2025.
Builds on
4 of 33 references.
References · 4
- 2013Clustering and Community Detection in Directed Networks: A Surveycited by 38
- 2016Predicting online extremism, content adopters, and interaction reciprocitycited by 10
- 2013Solutions to Detect and Analyze Online Radicalization : A Surveycited by 1
- 2014Online Social Media in the Syria Conflict: Encompassing the Extremes and the In-Betweenscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.