mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A comparison of data filtering techniques for English-Polish LLM-based machine translation in the biomedical domain

arXiv 2501.16533 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become state-of-the-art in Machine Translation (MT), often trained on massive bilingual parallel corpora scraped from the web, that contain low-quality entries and redundant information, leading to significant computational challenges. Various data filtering methods exist to reduce dataset sizes, but their effectiveness largely varies based on specific language pairs and domains. This paper evaluates the impact of commonly used data filtering techniques, such as LASER, MUSE, and LaBSE, on English-Polish translation within the biomedical domain. By filtering the UFAL Medical Corpus, we created varying dataset sizes to fine-tune the mBART50 model, which was then evaluated using the SacreBLEU metric on the Khresmoi dataset, having the quality of translations assessed by bilingual speakers. Our results show that both LASER and MUSE can significantly reduce dataset sizes while maintaining or even enhancing performance. We recommend the use of LASER, as it consistently outperforms the other methods and provides the most fluent and natural-sounding translations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2025.

Builds on

5 of 16 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  2. 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 487
  3. 2017Learning Joint Multilingual Sentence Representations with Neural Machine Translationcited by 52
  4. 2019Low-Resource Corpus Filtering using Multilingual Sentence Embeddingscited by 25
  5. 2023An Efficient Multilingual Language Model Compression through Vocabulary Trimmingcited by 20

Built on by

Not cited yet.