FuzzyLight: A Robust Two-Stage Fuzzy Approach for Traffic Signal Control Works in Real Cities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Effective traffic signal control (TSC) is crucial in mitigating urban congestion and reducing emissions. Recently, reinforcement learning (RL) has been the research trend for TSC. However, existing RL algorithms face several real-world challenges that hinder their practical deployment in TSC: (1) Sensor accuracy deteriorates with increased sensor detection range, and data transmission is prone to noise, potentially resulting in unsafe TSC decisions. (2) During the training of online RL, interactions with the environment could be unstable, potentially leading to inappropriate traffic signal phase (TSP) selection and traffic congestion. (3) Most current TSC algorithms focus only on TSP decisions, overlooking the critical aspect of phase duration, affecting safety and efficiency. To overcome these challenges, we propose a robust two-stage fuzzy approach called FuzzyLight, which integrates compressed sensing and RL for TSC deployment. FuzzyLight offers several key contributions: (1) It employs fuzzy logic and compressed sensing to address sensor noise and enhances the efficiency of TSP decisions. (2) It maintains stable performance during training and combines fuzzy logic with RL to generate precise phases. (3) It works in real cities across 22 intersections and demonstrates superior performance in both real-world and simulated environments. Experimental results indicate that FuzzyLight enhances traffic efficiency by 48% compared to expert-designed timings in the real world. Furthermore, it achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in simulated environments using six real-world datasets with transmission noise. The code and deployment video are available at the URL1
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2025.
Builds on
13 of 38 references.
References · 13
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 840
- 2023V2V4Real: A Real-world Large-scale Dataset for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Perceptioncited by 155
- 2019CoLight: Learning Network-level Cooperation for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 138
- 2019Learning Phase Competition for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 87
- 2019A Survey on Traffic Signal Control Methodscited by 79
- 2020AttendLight: Universal Attention-Based Reinforcement Learning Model for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 62
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Light Control in Vehicular Networkscited by 52
- 2023Reinforcement Learning Approaches for Traffic Signal Control under Missing Datacited by 13
- 2023DuaLight: Enhancing Traffic Signal Control by Leveraging Scenario-Specific and Scenario-Shared Knowledgecited by 9
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023A Fully Data-Driven Approach for Realistic Traffic Signal Control Using Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 2023Traffic Signal Control Using Lightweight Transformers: An Offline-to-Online RL Approach
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Traffic Signal Control: Turn-Based and Time-Based Approaches to Reduce Congestion
- 2025Reinforcement Learning Based Traffic Signal Design to Minimize Queue Lengths
- 2024GuideLight: "Industrial Solution" Guidance for More Practical Traffic Signal Control Agents
- 2025Robustness of Reinforcement Learning-Based Traffic Signal Control under Incidents: A Comparative Study
- 2026Reinforcement Learning-Based Traffic Signal Control for IoT-Enabled Intersections
- 2026A Robust and Efficient Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Traffic Signal Control