mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessing the Impact of Sampling Irregularity in Time Series Data: Human Activity Recognition As A Case Study

arXiv 2501.15330 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2025eess.SPcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human activity recognition (HAR) ideally relies on data from wearable or environment-instrumented sensors sampled at regular intervals, enabling standard neural network models optimized for consistent time-series data as input. However, real-world sensor data often exhibits irregular sampling due to, for example, hardware constraints, power-saving measures, or communication delays, posing challenges for deployed static HAR models. This study assesses the impact of sampling irregularities on HAR by simulating irregular data through two methods: introducing slight inconsistencies in sampling intervals (timestamp variations) to mimic sensor jitter, and randomly removing data points (random dropout) to simulate missing values due to packet loss or sensor failure. We evaluate both discrete-time neural networks and continuous-time neural networks, which are designed to handle continuous-time data, on three public datasets. We demonstrate that timestamp variations do not significantly affect the performance of discrete-time neural networks, and the continuous-time neural network is also ineffective in addressing the challenges posed by irregular sampling, possibly due to limitations in modeling complex temporal patterns with missing data. Our findings underscore the necessity for new models or approaches that can robustly handle sampling irregularity in time-series data, like the reading in human activity recognition, paving the way for future research in this domain.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.