mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EvalSVA: Multi-Agent Evaluators for Next-Gen Software Vulnerability Assessment

arXiv 2501.14737 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2024cs.SE cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Software Vulnerability (SV) assessment is a crucial process of determining different aspects of SVs (e.g., attack vectors and scope) for developers to effectively prioritize efforts in vulnerability mitigation. It presents a challenging and laborious process due to the complexity of SVs and the scarcity of labeled data. To mitigate the above challenges, we introduce EvalSVA, a multi-agent evaluators team to autonomously deliberate and evaluate various aspects of SV assessment. Specifically, we propose a multi-agent-based framework to simulate vulnerability assessment strategies in real-world scenarios, which employs multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) into an integrated group to enhance the effectiveness of SV assessment in the limited data. We also design diverse communication strategies to autonomously discuss and assess different aspects of SV. Furthermore, we construct a multi-lingual SV assessment dataset based on the new standard of CVSS, comprising 699, 888, and 1,310 vulnerability-related commits in C++, Python, and Java, respectively. Our experimental results demonstrate that EvalSVA averagely outperforms the 44.12% accuracy and 43.29% F1 for SV assessment compared with the previous methods. It shows that EvalSVA offers a human-like process and generates both reason and answer for SV assessment. EvalSVA can also aid human experts in SV assessment, which provides more explanation and details for SV assessment.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2024.

Builds on

11 of 34 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
  2. 2023What Makes Good In-context Demonstrations for Code Intelligence Tasks with LLMs?cited by 47
  3. 2024Multitask-based Evaluation of Open-Source LLM on Software Vulnerabilitycited by 23
  4. 2021SPI: Automated Identification of Security Patches via Commitscited by 19
  5. 2021A Survey on Data-driven Software Vulnerability Assessment and Prioritizationcited by 18
  6. 2023AIBugHunter: A Practical Tool for Predicting, Classifying and Repairing Software Vulnerabilitiescited by 17
  7. 2021Automated Software Vulnerability Assessment with Concept Driftcited by 15
  8. 2021DeepCVA: Automated Commit-level Vulnerability Assessment with Deep Multi-task Learningcited by 11
  9. 2023Uncovering the Causes of Emotions in Software Developer Communication Using Zero-shot LLMscited by 5
  10. 2021Early Detection of Security-Relevant Bug Reports using Machine Learning: How Far Are We?cited by 2
  11. 2022An Empirical Study of Automation in Software Security Patch Managementcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgenticVM: Agentic AI for Adaptive Software Vulnerability Management
  2. 2025From CVE Entries to Verifiable Exploits: An Automated Multi-Agent Framework for Reproducing CVEs
  3. 2025Reasoning with LLMs for Zero-Shot Vulnerability Detection
  4. 2025ReVul-CoT: Towards Effective Software Vulnerability Assessment with Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Chain-of-Thought Prompting
  5. 2025Automated Vulnerability Validation and Verification: A Large Language Model Approach
  6. 2026An Empirical Evaluation of LLM-Based Approaches for Code Vulnerability Detection: RAG, SFT, and Dual-Agent Systems
  7. 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks
  8. 2026FuzzingBrain V2: A Multi-Agent LLM System for Automated Vulnerability Discovery and Reproduction