Can Hallucinations Help? Boosting LLMs for Drug Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), plausible but factually inaccurate text, are often viewed as undesirable. However, recent work suggests that such outputs may hold creative potential. In this paper, we investigate whether hallucinations can improve LLMs on molecule property prediction, a key task in early-stage drug discovery. We prompt LLMs to generate natural language descriptions from molecular SMILES strings and incorporate these often hallucinated descriptions into downstream classification tasks. Evaluating seven instruction-tuned LLMs across five datasets, we find that hallucinations significantly improve predictive accuracy for some models. Notably, Falcon3-Mamba-7B outperforms all baselines when hallucinated text is included, while hallucinations generated by GPT-4o consistently yield the greatest gains between models. We further identify and categorize over 18,000 beneficial hallucinations, with structural misdescriptions emerging as the most impactful type, suggesting that hallucinated statements about molecular structure may increase model confidence. Ablation studies show that larger models benefit more from hallucinations, while temperature has a limited effect. Our findings challenge conventional views of hallucination as purely problematic and suggest new directions for leveraging hallucinations as a useful signal in scientific modeling tasks like drug discovery.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.
Builds on
15 of 44 references.
References · 15
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,037
- 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 219
- 2023OpenAGI: When LLM Meets Domain Expertscited by 196
- 2022Multi-modal Molecule Structure-text Model for Text-based Retrieval and Editingcited by 165
- 2023A Confederacy of Models: a Comprehensive Evaluation of LLMs on Creative Writingcited by 98
- 2024DrugAgent: Automating AI-aided Drug Discovery Programming through LLM Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 40
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Model Hallucination via a Creativity Perspectivecited by 38
- 2023Probing the Creativity of Large Language Models: Can models produce divergent semantic association?cited by 31
- 2024Large Language Models in Drug Discovery and Development: From Disease Mechanisms to Clinical Trialscited by 24
- 2024Heads, Tails, and AI Fails: LLMs, Randomness, and Human Judgmentscited by 23
- 2024A Survey on Natural Language Counterfactual Generationcited by 21
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026HalluGuard: Demystifying Data-Driven and Reasoning-Driven Hallucinations in LLMs
- 2025Triggering Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantitative Study of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Large Language Models
- 2025Toward Reliable Scientific Hypothesis Generation: Evaluating Truthfulness and Hallucination in Large Language Models
- 2025Theoretical Foundations and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Language Models
- 2024Banishing LLM Hallucinations Requires Rethinking Generalization
- 2026PRISM: Probing Reasoning, Instruction, and Source Memory in LLM Hallucinations
- 2023Chainpoll: A high efficacy method for LLM hallucination detection
- 2026Evaluating Hallucinations in Domain-Adapted Large Language Models