mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do Large Language Models Truly Understand Geometric Structures?

arXiv 2501.13773 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2025cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Geometric ability is a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs) due to the need for advanced spatial comprehension and abstract thinking. Existing datasets primarily evaluate LLMs on their final answers, but they cannot truly measure their true understanding of geometric structures, as LLMs can arrive at correct answers by coincidence. To fill this gap, we introduce the GeomRel dataset, designed to evaluate LLMs' understanding of geometric structures by isolating the core step of geometric relationship identification in problem-solving. Using this benchmark, we conduct thorough evaluations of diverse LLMs and identify key limitations in understanding geometric structures. We further propose the Geometry Chain-of-Thought (GeoCoT) method, which enhances LLMs' ability to identify geometric relationships, resulting in significant performance improvements.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.

Builds on

21 of 34 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  7. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  8. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  9. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  10. 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Modelscited by 688
  11. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  12. 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
9 more
  1. 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 530
  2. 2021Inter-GPS: Interpretable Geometry Problem Solving with Formal Language and Symbolic Reasoningcited by 383
  3. 2023Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 288
  4. 2021GeoQA: A Geometric Question Answering Benchmark Towards Multimodal Numerical Reasoningcited by 228
  5. 2022UniGeo: Unifying Geometry Logical Reasoning via Reformulating Mathematical Expressioncited by 137
  6. 2023GeomVerse: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Models for Geometric Reasoningcited by 108
  7. 2023A Multi-Modal Neural Geometric Solver with Textual Clauses Parsed from Diagramcited by 56
  8. 2024GeoEval: Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs and Multi-Modal Models on Geometry Problem-Solvingcited by 45
  9. 2024GOLD: Geometry Problem Solver with Natural Language Descriptioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026NoReGeo: Non-Reasoning Geometry Benchmark
  2. 2024Beyond Lines and Circles: Unveiling the Geometric Reasoning Gap in Large Language Models
  3. 2025GeoThought: A Dataset for Enhancing Mathematical Geometry Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Stuck in the Matrix: Probing Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
  5. 2026From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
  6. 2026Measuring Representation Robustness in Large Language Models for Geometry
  7. 2023G-LLaVA: Solving Geometric Problem with Multi-Modal Large Language Model
  8. 2025GeoSense: Evaluating Identification and Application of Geometric Principles in Multimodal Reasoning