mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RECALL: Library-Like Behavior In Language Models is Enhanced by Self-Referencing Causal Cycles

arXiv 2501.13491 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the concept of the self-referencing causal cycle (abbreviated RECALL) - a mechanism that enables large language models (LLMs) to bypass the limitations of unidirectional causality, which underlies a phenomenon known as the reversal curse. When an LLM is prompted with sequential data, it often fails to recall preceding context. For example, when we ask an LLM to recall the line preceding "O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave" in the U.S. National Anthem, it often fails to correctly return "Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there" - this is due to the reversal curse. It occurs because language models such as ChatGPT and Llama generate text based on preceding tokens, requiring facts to be learned and reproduced in a consistent token order. While the reversal curse is often viewed as a limitation, we offer evidence of an alternative view: it is not always an obstacle in practice. We find that RECALL is driven by what we designate as cycle tokens - sequences that connect different parts of the training data, enabling recall of preceding tokens from succeeding ones. Through rigorous probabilistic formalization and controlled experiments, we demonstrate how the cycles they induce influence a model's ability to reproduce information. To facilitate reproducibility, we provide our code and experimental details at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/remember-B0B8/.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.

Builds on

15 of 19 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  6. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  7. 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 399
  8. 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 229
  9. 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.2, Knowledge Manipulationcited by 142
  10. 2020Language Models as Knowledge Bases: On Entity Representations, Storage Capacity, and Paraphrased Queriescited by 107
  11. 2024Reverse Training to Nurse the Reversal Cursecited by 48
  12. 2024Reverse Thinking Makes LLMs Stronger Reasonerscited by 29
3 more
  1. 2024Are Language Models More Like Libraries or Like Librarians? Bibliotechnism, the Novel Reference Problem, and the Attitudes of LLMscited by 11
  2. 2024Mitigating Reversal Curse in Large Language Models via Semantic-aware Permutation Trainingcited by 11
  3. 2024The Curse of Popularity: Popular Entities have Catastrophic Side Effects when Deleting Knowledge from Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.