mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Regularization, Semi-supervision, and Supervision for a Plausible Attention-Based Explanation

arXiv 2501.12775 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attention mechanism is contributing to the majority of recent advances in machine learning for natural language processing. Additionally, it results in an attention map that shows the proportional influence of each input in its decision. Empirical studies postulate that attention maps can be provided as an explanation for model output. However, it is still questionable to ask whether this explanation helps regular people to understand and accept the model output (the plausibility of the explanation). Recent studies show that attention weights in the RNN encoders are hardly plausible because they spread on input tokens. We thus propose 3 additional constraints to the learning objective function to improve the plausibility of the attention map: regularization to increase the attention weight sparsity, semi-supervision to supervise the map by a heuristic and supervision by human annotation. Results show that all techniques can improve the attention map plausibility at some level. We also observe that specific instructions for human annotation might have a negative effect on classification performance. Beyond the attention map, the result of experiments on text classification tasks also shows that no matter how the constraint brings the gain, the contextualization layer plays a crucial role in finding the right space for finding plausible tokens.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2025.

Builds on

21 of 33 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
  2. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  3. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  4. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  5. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  6. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  7. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  8. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  9. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
  10. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  11. 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 337
  12. 2021Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processingcited by 126
9 more
  1. 2020The elephant in the interpretability room: Why use attention as explanation when we have saliency methods?cited by 122
  2. 2019Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based Explanationscited by 111
  3. 2019Attention Interpretability Across NLP Taskscited by 71
  4. 2020An Information Bottleneck Approach for Controlling Conciseness in Rationale Extractioncited by 69
  5. 2019Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trialscited by 63
  6. 2020Towards Transparent and Explainable Attention Modelscited by 47
  7. 2020Why Attentions May Not Be Interpretable?cited by 41
  8. 2022Can Rationalization Improve Robustness?cited by 36
  9. 2018Who is Killed by Police: Introducing Supervised Attention for Hierarchical LSTMscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.