REX: Causal discovery based on machine learning and explainability techniques
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques hold significant potential for enhancing the causal discovery process, which is crucial for understanding complex systems in areas like healthcare, economics, and artificial intelligence. However, no causal discovery methods currently incorporate explainability into their models to derive the causal graphs. Thus, in this paper we explore this innovative approach, as it offers substantial potential and represents a promising new direction worth investigating. Specifically, we introduce ReX, a causal discovery method that leverages machine learning (ML) models coupled with explainability techniques, specifically Shapley values, to identify and interpret significant causal relationships among variables. Comparative evaluations on synthetic datasets comprising continuous tabular data reveal that ReX outperforms state-of-the-art causal discovery methods across diverse data generation processes, including non-linear and additive noise models. Moreover, ReX was tested on the Sachs single-cell protein-signaling dataset, achieving a precision of 0.952 and recovering key causal relationships with no incorrect edges. Taking together, these results showcase ReX's effectiveness in accurately recovering true causal structures while minimizing false positive predictions, its robustness across diverse datasets, and its applicability to real-world problems. By combining ML and explainability techniques with causal discovery, ReX bridges the gap between predictive modeling and causal inference, offering an effective tool for understanding complex causal structures.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2025.
Builds on
16 of 45 references.
References · 16
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
- 2019DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 329
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
- 2013Causal Discovery with Continuous Additive Noise Modelscited by 252
- 2013CAM: Causal additive models, high-dimensional order search and penalized regressioncited by 175
- 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 164
- 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 123
- 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
- 2020Causality Learning: A New Perspective for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 28
4 more
- 2020Predictive and Causal Implications of using Shapley Value for Model Interpretationcited by 16
- 2018FASK with Interventional Knowledge Recovers Edges from the Sachs Modelcited by 13
- 2024Post-selection inference for causal effects after causal discoverycited by 7
- 2022Interpretability and causal discovery of the machine learning models to predict the production of CBM wells after hydraulic fracturingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.