The Explanation Game -- Rekindled (Extended Version)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work demonstrated the existence of critical flaws in the current use of Shapley values in explainable AI (XAI), i.e. the so-called SHAP scores. These flaws are significant in that the scores provided to a human decision-maker can be misleading. Although these negative results might appear to indicate that Shapley values ought not be used in XAI, this paper argues otherwise. Concretely, this paper proposes a novel definition of SHAP scores that overcomes existing flaws. Furthermore, the paper outlines a practically efficient solution for the rigorous estimation of the novel SHAP scores. Preliminary experimental results confirm our claims, and further underscore the flaws of the current SHAP scores.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2025.
Builds on
12 of 38 references.
References · 12
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
- 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 139
- 2020On the Tractability of SHAP Explanationscited by 92
- 2022Logic-Based Explainability in Machine Learningcited by 47
- 2021On the Complexity of SHAP-Score-Based Explanations: Tractability via Knowledge Compilation and Non-Approximability Resultscited by 32
- 2023The Inadequacy of Shapley Values for Explainabilitycited by 30
- 2024From SHAP Scores to Feature Importance Scorescited by 8
- 2024Abductive explanations of classifiers under constraints: Complexity and propertiescited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Towards Rigorous Explainability by Feature Attributioncited by 0
- 2026Towards Rigorous Explainability by Feature Attribution17 Apr 2026