On the dimension of pullback attractors in recurrent neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recurrent neural networks trained via the reservoir computing paradigm have demonstrated remarkable success in learning and reconstructing attractors from chaotic systems, often replicating quantities such as Lyapunov exponents and fractal dimensions. It has recently been conjectured that this is because the reservoir computer embeds the dynamics of the chaotic system in its state space before learning. This conjecture has been established for reservoir computers with linear activation functions and remains open for more general reservoir systems. In this work, we employ a non-autonomous dynamical systems approach to establish an upper bound for the box-counting dimension of the pullback attractor, a subset of the reservoir state space that is approximated during training and prediction phases. We prove that the box-counting dimension of the pullback attractor is bounded above by the box-counting dimension of the space of input sequences with respect to the product topology. In particular, for input sequences originating from an Nin-dimensional smooth dynamical system or their generic continuously differentiable observations, the box-counting dimension of the pullback attractor is bounded above by Nin. The results obtained here highlight the fact that, while a reservoir computer may possess a very high-dimensional state space, it exhibits effective low-dimensional dynamics. Our findings also partly explain why reservoir computers are successful in tasks such as attractor reconstruction and the computation of dynamic invariants like Lyapunov exponents and fractal dimensions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2025.
Builds on
11 of 55 references.
References · 11
- 2019Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Forecasting: Current Status and Future Directionscited by 172
- 2018Echo state networks are universalcited by 86
- 2020Machine learning prediction of critical transition and system collapsecited by 54
- 2018Can recurrent neural networks warp time?cited by 53
- 2022Using Machine Learning to Anticipate Tipping Points and Extrapolate to Post-Tipping Dynamics of Non-Stationary Dynamical Systemscited by 33
- 2020Fading memory echo state networks are universalcited by 31
- 2020Multifunctionality in a Reservoir Computercited by 21
- 2021Learning strange attractors with reservoir systemscited by 16
- 2018Interpreting recurrent neural networks behaviour via excitable network attractorscited by 15
- 2023Attractor reconstruction with reservoir computers: The effect of the reservoir's conditional Lyapunov exponents on faithful attractor reconstructioncited by 9
- 2023Transitions in echo index and dependence on input repetitionscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.