DeepIFSAC: Deep Imputation of Missing Values Using Feature and Sample Attention within Contrastive Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Missing values of varying patterns and rates in real-world tabular data pose a significant challenge in developing reliable data-driven models. The most commonly used statistical and machine learning methods for missing value imputation may be ineffective when the missing rate is high and not random. This paper explores row and column attention in tabular data as between-feature and between-sample attention in a novel framework to reconstruct missing values. The proposed method uses CutMix data augmentation within a contrastive learning framework to improve the uncertainty of missing value estimation. The performance and generalizability of trained imputation models are evaluated in set-aside test data folds with missing values. The proposed framework is compared with 11 state-of-the-art statistical, machine learning, and deep imputation methods using 12 diverse tabular data sets. The average performance rank of our proposed method demonstrates its superiority over the state-of-the-art methods for missing rates between 10% and 90% and three missing value types, especially when the missing values are not random. The quality of the imputed data using our proposed method is compared in a downstream patient classification task using real-world electronic health records. This paper highlights the heterogeneity of tabular data sets to recommend imputation methods based on missing value types and data characteristics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2025.
Builds on
21 of 43 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
- 2018GAIN: Missing Data Imputation using Generative Adversarial Netscited by 349
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
- 2021Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular Datasetscited by 151
- 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 151
- 2021Self-Attention Between Datapoints: Going Beyond Individual Input-Output Pairs in Deep Learningcited by 112
9 more
- 2022HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selectioncited by 81
- 2022Diffusion models for missing value imputation in tabular datacited by 77
- 2023MissDiff: Training Diffusion Models on Tabular Data with Missing Valuescited by 38
- 2023ExcelFormer: A neural network surpassing GBDTs on tabular datacited by 33
- 2023Deep Imputation of Missing Values in Time Series Health Data: A Review with Benchmarkingcited by 29
- 2024DiffPuter: Empowering Diffusion Models for Missing Data Imputationcited by 17
- 2022Missing Value Estimation using Clustering and Deep Learning within Multiple Imputation Frameworkcited by 13
- 2024Attention versus Contrastive Learning of Tabular Data -- A Data-centric Benchmarkingcited by 9
- 2024DiffImpute: Tabular Data Imputation With Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.