mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GTDE: Grouped Training with Decentralized Execution for Multi-agent Actor-Critic

arXiv 2501.10367 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2024cs.MA cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has given rise to diverse training paradigms to learn the policies of each agent in the multi-agent system. The paradigms of decentralized training and execution (DTDE) and centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE) have been proposed and widely applied. However, as the number of agents increases, the inherent limitations of these frameworks significantly degrade the performance metrics, such as win rate, total reward, etc. To reduce the influence of the increasing number of agents on the performance metrics, we propose a novel training paradigm of grouped training decentralized execution (GTDE). This framework eliminates the need for a centralized module and relies solely on local information, effectively meeting the training requirements of large-scale multi-agent systems. Specifically, we first introduce an adaptive grouping module, which divides each agent into different groups based on their observation history. To implement end-to-end training, GTDE uses Gumbel-Sigmoid for efficient point-to-point sampling on the grouping distribution while ensuring gradient backpropagation. To adapt to the uncertainty in the number of members in a group, two methods are used to implement a group information aggregation module that merges member information within the group. Empirical results show that in a cooperative environment with 495 agents, GTDE increased the total reward by an average of 382% compared to the baseline. In a competitive environment with 64 agents, GTDE achieved a 100% win rate against the baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2024.

Builds on

12 of 29 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  2. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  3. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  4. 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 281
  5. 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 259
  6. 2020Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Taskscited by 207
  7. 2018Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 202
  8. 2020ROMA: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Emergent Rolescited by 135
  9. 2019Multi-Agent Game Abstraction via Graph Attention Neural Networkcited by 81
  10. 2017MAgent: A Many-Agent Reinforcement Learning Platform for Artificial Collective Intelligencecited by 69
  11. 2020Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 38
  12. 2022Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Warehouse Logistics with Robotic and Human Co-Workerscited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.