I Can Find You in Seconds! Leveraging Large Language Models for Code Authorship Attribution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Source code authorship attribution is important in software forensics, plagiarism detection, and protecting software patch integrity. Existing techniques often rely on supervised machine learning, which struggles with generalization across different programming languages and coding styles due to the need for large labeled datasets. Inspired by recent advances in natural language authorship analysis using large language models (LLMs), which have shown exceptional performance without task-specific tuning, this paper explores the use of LLMs for source code authorship attribution. We present a comprehensive study demonstrating that state-of-the-art LLMs can successfully attribute source code authorship across different languages. LLMs can determine whether two code snippets are written by the same author with zero-shot prompting, achieving a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.78, and can attribute code authorship from a small set of reference code snippets via few-shot learning, achieving MCC of 0.77. Additionally, LLMs show some adversarial robustness against misattribution attacks. Despite these capabilities, we found that naive prompting of LLMs does not scale well with a large number of authors due to input token limitations. To address this, we propose a tournament-style approach for large-scale attribution. Evaluating this approach on datasets of C++ (500 authors, 26,355 samples) and Java (686 authors, 55,267 samples) code from GitHub, we achieve classification accuracy of up to 65% for C++ and 68.7% for Java using only one reference per author. These results open new possibilities for applying LLMs to code authorship attribution in cybersecurity and software engineering.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysiscited by 10
- 2025I Know Which LLM Wrote Your Code Last Summer: LLM generated Code Stylometry for Authorship Attributioncited by 9
- 2025The Hidden DNA of LLM-Generated JavaScript: Structural Patterns Enable High-Accuracy Authorship Attributioncited by 2
- 2025Style2Code: A Style-Controllable Code Generation Framework with Dual-Modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 1
- 2025Large Language Models and Forensic Linguistics: Navigating Opportunities and Threats in the Age of Generative AIcited by 0
- 2026MACAA: Belief-Revision Multi-Agent Reasoning for Code Authorship Verificationcited by 0
- 2026MACAA: Belief-Revision Multi-Agent Reasoning for Code Authorship Verification10 May 2026
- 2025Large Language Models and Forensic Linguistics: Navigating Opportunities and Threats in the Age of Generative AI7 Dec 2025
- 2025The Hidden DNA of LLM-Generated JavaScript: Structural Patterns Enable High-Accuracy Authorship Attribution12 Oct 2025
- 2025I Know Which LLM Wrote Your Code Last Summer: LLM generated Code Stylometry for Authorship Attribution18 Jun 2025
- 2025Style2Code: A Style-Controllable Code Generation Framework with Dual-Modal Contrastive Representation Learning26 May 2025
- 2025A Contemporary Survey of Large Language Model Assisted Program Analysis5 Feb 2025