mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence-Supported Pentesting: A Comparison between Claude Opus, GPT-4, and Copilot

arXiv 2501.06963 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has brought a significant change to our society. GenAI can be applied across numerous fields, with particular relevance in cybersecurity. Among the various areas of application, its use in penetration testing (pentesting) or ethical hacking processes is of special interest. In this paper, we have analyzed the potential of leading generic-purpose GenAI tools-Claude Opus, GPT-4 from ChatGPT, and Copilot-in augmenting the penetration testing process as defined by the Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES). Our analysis involved evaluating each tool across all PTES phases within a controlled virtualized environment. The findings reveal that, while these tools cannot fully automate the pentesting process, they provide substantial support by enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in specific tasks. Notably, all tools demonstrated utility; however, Claude Opus consistently outperformed the others in our experimental scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2025.

Builds on

4 of 35 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacycited by 137
  2. 2023Getting pwn'd by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Modelscited by 82
  3. 2024The Social Impact of Generative AI: An Analysis on ChatGPTcited by 18
  4. 2024Exploring ChatGPT and its Impact on Societycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.