Integrators at War: Mediating in AI-assisted Resort-to-Force Decisions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The integration of AI systems into the military domain is changing the way war-related decisions are made. It binds together three disparate groups of actors - developers, integrators, users - and creates a relationship between these groups and the machine, embedded in the (pre-)existing organisational and system structures. In this article, we focus on the important, but often neglected, group of integrators within such a sociotechnical system. In complex human-machine configurations, integrators carry responsibility for linking the disparate groups of developers and users in the political and military system. To act as the mediating group requires a deep understanding of the other groups' activities, perspectives and norms. We thus ask which challenges and shortcomings emerge from integrating AI systems into resort-to-force (RTF) decision-making processes, and how to address them. To answer this, we proceed in three steps. First, we conceptualise the relationship between different groups of actors and AI systems as a sociotechnical system. Second, we identify challenges within such systems for human-machine teaming in RTF decisions. We focus on challenges that arise a) from the technology itself, b) from the integrators' role in the sociotechnical system, c) from the human-machine interaction. Third, we provide policy recommendations to address these shortcomings when integrating AI systems into RTF decision-making structures.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2025.
Builds on
4 of 34 references.
References · 4
- 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
- 2024Escalation Risks from Language Models in Military and Diplomatic Decision-Makingcited by 63
- 2023A/B Testing: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 16
- 2023Manifesto for the Responsible Development of Mathematical Works -- A Tool for Practitioners and for Managementcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.