EmoXpt: Analyzing Emotional Variances in Human Comments and LLM-Generated Responses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread adoption of generative AI has generated diverse opinions, with individuals expressing both support and criticism of its applications. This study investigates the emotional dynamics surrounding generative AI by analyzing human tweets referencing terms such as ChatGPT, OpenAI, Copilot, and LLMs. To further understand the emotional intelligence of ChatGPT, we examine its responses to selected tweets, highlighting differences in sentiment between human comments and LLM-generated responses. We introduce EmoXpt, a sentiment analysis framework designed to assess both human perspectives on generative AI and the sentiment embedded in ChatGPT's responses. Unlike prior studies that focus exclusively on human sentiment, EmoXpt uniquely evaluates the emotional expression of ChatGPT. Experimental results demonstrate that LLM-generated responses are notably more efficient, cohesive, and consistently positive than human responses.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2025.
Builds on
3 of 26 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.